False positive spec #276
Comments
|
It's not a false positive because author file is being overwritten |
tagliala
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2024
Also refactor specs to use `join` instead of `+` because it's shorter, clearer, and uses less memory, even if it is slightly less performant in terms of IPS Ref: #276
tagliala
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2024
Also refactor specs to use `join` instead of `+` because it's shorter, clearer, and uses less memory, even if it is slightly less performant in terms of IPS Ref: #276
tagliala
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2024
Also refactor document spec by using `join` instead of `+` because it's shorter, clearer, and uses less memory, even if it is slightly less performant in terms of IPS Ref: #276
tagliala
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2024
Also refactor document spec by using `join` instead of `+` because it's shorter, clearer, and uses less memory, even if it is slightly less performant in terms of IPS Ref: #276
tagliala
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2024
Also refactor document spec by using `join` instead of `+` because it's shorter, clearer, and uses less memory, even if it is slightly less performant in terms of IPS Ref: #276
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
$ rspec ./spec/lib/document_spec.rb:150 # Colore::Document#add_file runs with author
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: