BUG: add upper-bound to BigQuery dependency

[tswast]

There are breaking changes in google-cloud-bigquery 2.0 that aren't
handled yet. Also, 2.0 seems to require a newer version of the protobuf
library than is available in CI.

Closes #2413

[jreback]

perfect, ping on green

[jreback]

see https://dev.azure.com/ibis-project/ibis/_build/results?buildId=3404&view=logs&j=8f09edc2-e3b7-52de-126a-0225c4f3efa1&t=78a72aec-b398-558e-7c0d-2d33604b9e53

need to change this: https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis/blob/master/ci/deps/bigquery.yml as well

[tswast]

Not sure why I'm getting an older version of protobuf even when I specify a minimum version in the YAML.

https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis/pull/2426/checks?check_run_id=1194407579#step:6:1217

9504d4e

[jreback]

is this not a transitive dep?

[tswast]

It is google-cloud-bigquery -> google-api-core -> protobuf. Added to see if that prevented getting too old of a version in CI, but seems I actually needed to update the recipe here: conda-forge/ibis-framework-feedstock#48

Will remove in my next commit.

[jreback]

add a newline

[jreback]

I see conda-forge/ibis-framework-feedstock#48

thanks @tswast

[jreback]

ok merged the conda-forge PR, I think we need to wait for builds then rebase this

[datapythonista]

It's a bit strange, it's failing because the moved omnisci backend, but that was updated in conda-forge/ibis-framework-feedstock#47 already.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/miniconda/conda-bld/ibis-framework_1601657511591/test_tmp/run_test.py", line 26, in <module>
    import ibis.omniscidb
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ibis.omniscidb'

[datapythonista]

Oh, I see that you reverted that @tswast. Can the OmniSci module be set to the correct module again?

[datapythonista]

I opened conda-forge/ibis-framework-feedstock#50, I guess with the two PRs, the CI should be fixed.

[jreback]

yeah let's try to get a green build with the updated packages that @tswast triggered now. Then let's disable this job for now; we really only care about this on release, BUT it is good to test it all the time, so need a better way.

[datapythonista]

Merging this, will disable the conda packaging in a follow up, so we have a green CI while we decide how to deal with the recipe.

[datapythonista]

Thanks @tswast