It is necessary to create PSL predicates to reflect basic ontology relations?

[igrangel]

We need to check if it is needed or good for our domain to have ontology predicates in our PSL model such as domain, range, inverse, etc. This paper utilizes them in their PSL model.
Also, this paper proposes a way of using the ontological knowledge in the PSL model.

[omarrana]

Can you please elaborate with an example. i tried to read papers but could not understand the way to use it.

[igrangel]

Can you initially reproduce this again in the code?
For examples about this, you can check the initial OntologyAlignment example. There are predicates for domain, range and subclass. For now, we should include only those.

[omarrana]

Updated:
Please add ontology folder path in config.ttl
uri:URI "C:/Users/omar/Documents/workspace-sts-3.7.0.RELEASE/Alligator-PSL/resources/".

so now we have hasDomain and hasRange and also hasType for current data so we can map it on to hasDomain and hasRange

However, i am not sure how to write rules for them. Can you take a look for rules?

[igrangel]

In the current version hasDomain and hasRange do not contain facts when converting. Can you please fix this?

[omarrana]

you must include the ontology folder in config.ttl , then it will work. It reads this information from ontology file.
uri:URI "C:/Users/omar/Desktop/SemCPS-/resources/".

[igrangel]

We also need to include the subClass and Inverse rules.

[omarrana]

hi pull first

…

________________________________ From: Irlan Grangel-Gonzalez <notifications@github.com> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 12:27:58 AM To: i40-Tools/SemCPS Cc: omar; Assign Subject: Re: [i40-Tools/SemCPS] It is necessary to create PSL predicates to reflect basic ontology relations? (#9) I did it and still not working. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALmM8woygk4Q3tAwch-Lnv9KkvvwtDS3ks5sSdPNgaJpZM4NNTr7>.