Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Minor grammar correction
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
doomspork committed Feb 7, 2025
1 parent 8ba036b commit ab5cd41
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/source/en/conceptual_guides/intro_agents.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ If that deterministic workflow fits all queries, by all means just code everythi

But what if the workflow can't be determined that well in advance?

For instance, a user wants to ask : `"I can come on Monday, but I forgot my passport so risk being delayed to Wednesday, is it possible to take me and my stuff to surf on Tuesday morning, with a cancellation insurance?"` This question hinges on many factors, and probably none of the predetermined criteria above will suffice for this request.
For instance, a user wants to ask: `"I can come on Monday, but I forgot my passport so risk being delayed to Wednesday, is it possible to take me and my stuff to surf on Tuesday morning, with a cancellation insurance?"` This question hinges on many factors, and probably none of the predetermined criteria above will suffice for this request.

If the pre-determined workflow falls short too often, that means you need more flexibility.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ In a multi-step agent, at each step, the LLM can write an action, in the form of

The reason for this simply that *we crafted our code languages specifically to be the best possible way to express actions performed by a computer*. If JSON snippets were a better expression, JSON would be the top programming language and programming would be hell on earth.

The figure below, taken from [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.01030), illustrate some advantages of writing actions in code:
The figure below, taken from [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.01030), illustrates some advantages of writing actions in code:

<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/transformers/code_vs_json_actions.png">

Expand All @@ -115,4 +115,4 @@ Writing actions in code rather than JSON-like snippets provides better:
- **Composability:** could you nest JSON actions within each other, or define a set of JSON actions to re-use later, the same way you could just define a python function?
- **Object management:** how do you store the output of an action like `generate_image` in JSON?
- **Generality:** code is built to express simply anything you can have a computer do.
- **Representation in LLM training data:** plenty of quality code actions is already included in LLMs’ training data which means they’re already trained for this!
- **Representation in LLM training data:** plenty of quality code actions are already included in LLMs’ training data which means they’re already trained for this!

0 comments on commit ab5cd41

Please sign in to comment.