Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor of code according to black #62

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024
Merged

Refactor of code according to black #62

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024

Conversation

joamag
Copy link
Contributor

@joamag joamag commented Jan 2, 2024

Changed the code structure to make it compliant with Black.

joamag added 2 commits January 2, 2024 14:40
Change the year in data ranges - happy 2024!
Removed some magic values in file headers.
@joamag joamag added enhancement New feature or request risky ❕ Seems to be risky refactor ☢️ Issue implies refactor of code labels Jan 2, 2024
@joamag joamag requested a review from hugo-gomes January 2, 2024 15:01
@joamag joamag self-assigned this Jan 2, 2024
@joamag joamag merged commit f24d1d6 into master Jan 2, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
@joamag joamag deleted the joamag/black branch January 2, 2024 15:04
@joamag
Copy link
Contributor Author

joamag commented Jan 2, 2024

Major merge! 🥳
CC: @hugo-gomes

Copy link
Member

@hugo-gomes hugo-gomes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joamag shouldn't the black's toml config file be added in order to fix the code formatter settings?

@joamag
Copy link
Contributor Author

joamag commented Jan 2, 2024

@hugo-gomes we're using the defaults, which is cool because there's no need for any file :) just run

black .

in the root directory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request refactor ☢️ Issue implies refactor of code risky ❕ Seems to be risky
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants