feat: overhaul SignedState.getAddressBook()

[anthony-swirldslabs]

Description:
This is the first step in a series of fixes to eventually remove AddressBook objects from the PlatformState. In this fix, the SignedState class now uses the RosterRetriever to fetch the active roster from the state. The latter automatically falls back to reading the AddressBook from the PlatformState if the RosterService data isn't populated.

Notable changes:

1. The crux of the fix is the SignedState.getAddressBook() implementation and the supporting SignedStateFileReader.registerServiceStates() that allows the former to access states of the RosterService and the PlatformState via the States API.
2. The SignedStateFileReader and the ReconnectLearner initialize these states to make the AddressBook/Roster accessible from the loaded/received SignedState.
3. The FakeMerkleStateLifecycles is similarly extended to enable accessing these states in tests (both unit, and JRS.)
4. The RandomSignedStateGenerator also enables the tests to uses these states, and it also registers all the generated states in ThreadLocal lists, allowing the tests to release them once the tests finish. This is now required to avoid producing OOMs due to a large number of VirtualMap instances created with each generated state.
5. RosterSchema is moved back to the platform code, and the RosterStateId is resurrected, again, to be accessed from the platform code and eliminate circular dependencies between app and platform.
6. Tests using VirtualMaps now have MerkleDb.resetDefaultInstancePath() calls to allow the VirtualMap implementation to create multiple instances of the same map on disk. W/o this call, the tests would clash because each of them would want to create the same ROSTERS map when a SignedState object is initialized in them.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #16541

Notes for reviewer:
Tests should pass.

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 53.33333% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.73%. Comparing base (5e7562f) to head (4f9e245).
Report is 8 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...platform/state/snapshot/SignedStateFileReader.java	72.72%	4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...s/demo/addressbook/AddressBookTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
.../java/com/swirlds/demo/iss/ISSTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...irlds/demo/migration/MigrationTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...swirlds/demo/platform/PlatformTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...emo/stats/signing/StatsSigningTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...com/swirlds/demo/stress/StressTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...s/demo/consistency/ConsistencyTestingToolMain.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../demo/consistency/ConsistencyTestingToolState.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...wirlds/demo/platform/PlatformTestingToolState.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop   #16656   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      63.73%   63.73%           
- Complexity     20483    20494   +11     
==========================================
  Files           2538     2538           
  Lines          95008    95035   +27     
  Branches        9931     9932    +1     
==========================================
+ Hits           60549    60572   +23     
- Misses         30839    30848    +9     
+ Partials        3620     3615    -5     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...java/com/hedera/node/app/roster/RosterService.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...va/com/hedera/node/app/tss/TssBaseServiceImpl.java	66.66% <ø> (ø)
...re/src/main/java/com/swirlds/platform/Browser.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...m/swirlds/platform/reconnect/ReconnectLearner.java	77.33% <100.00%> (+0.62%)	⬆️
...tform/state/service/schemas/V0540RosterSchema.java	92.30% <ø> (ø)
...com/swirlds/platform/state/signed/SignedState.java	85.13% <100.00%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
...java/com/swirlds/state/merkle/MerkleStateRoot.java	86.68% <100.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
...s/demo/consistency/ConsistencyTestingToolMain.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../demo/consistency/ConsistencyTestingToolState.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...wirlds/demo/platform/PlatformTestingToolState.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

... and 17 files with indirect coverage changes

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 57.78%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5e7562f)	97773	63979	65.44%
Head commit (4f9e245)	97800 (+27)	63997 (+18)	65.44% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#16656)	45	26	57.78%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[tinker-michaelj]

Makes sense to me, tyvm @anthony-swirldslabs !