feat: Implements HIP-632 isAuthorized method

[david-bakin-sl]

Description:

Implements isAuthorized method of HIP-632.

(Better PR description forthcoming.)

Related issue(s):

Fixes #16092

Notes for reviewer:

Adding a constructor argument to HasCallAttempt - the SignatureVerifier - had effects on a lot of unrelated unit tests. Because: A new argument had to be mocked and supplied to all instantiations of that class. But in nearly all cases 5 of the 7 arguments are simply passing in mocks, which mostly don't even have givens). So the next time we add an argument to such a constructor maybe we could refactor all those calls ... or do it as a cleanup sometime sooner just in case...

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.38462% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.38%. Comparing base (828edeb) to head (3b3b6f5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...racts/has/isauthorized/IsAuthorizedTranslator.java	88.88%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...emcontracts/has/isauthorized/IsAuthorizedCall.java	97.61%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop   #16364      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      63.36%   63.38%   +0.02%     
- Complexity     20081    20099      +18     
=============================================
  Files           2524     2526       +2     
  Lines          93590    93655      +65     
  Branches        9801     9808       +7     
=============================================
+ Hits           59301    59366      +65     
  Misses         30689    30689              
  Partials        3600     3600              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...a/com/hedera/node/config/data/ContractsConfig.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...act/impl/exec/processors/HasTranslatorsModule.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../impl/exec/systemcontracts/has/HasCallAttempt.java	56.00% <100.00%> (+3.82%)	⬆️
.../impl/exec/systemcontracts/has/HasCallFactory.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...racts/has/isauthorizedraw/IsAuthorizedRawCall.java	34.34% <100.00%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
...act/impl/exec/systemcontracts/hts/ReturnTypes.java	92.30% <ø> (ø)
...emcontracts/has/isauthorized/IsAuthorizedCall.java	97.61% <97.61%> (ø)
...racts/has/isauthorized/IsAuthorizedTranslator.java	88.88% <88.88%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.02% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 96.92%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (828edeb)	96409	62763	65.10%
Head commit (3b3b6f5)	96474 (+65)	62828 (+65)	65.12% (+0.02%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#16364)	65	63	96.92%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[lukelee-sl]

LGTM. Just some comments for future cleanup

[kimbor]

lgtm!