feat: added redis in docker-compose

[sahil9001]

Description:
This PR adds redis to the docker-compose so that both servers can share the cache among themselves.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #1869

Notes for reviewer:

Docker Containers up & running :

Environmental variables :

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[AlfredoG87]

Overall looks good.
leaved some nits.

[AlfredoG87]

@sahil9001 |
Also for contributing to ANY hedera (hiero) repository, you will need to sign your commits... there are several great guides on how to configure your keys and sign-off your commits.

when you do so the DCO check on the CI will pass.

hint: you will need to force push, once you configure your GPG Key do the following:

git reset --soft HEAD~1
git commit -s -m "Your commit message"
git push --force

The git reset the last commit but keeps the changes (soft)
the git commit with -s signs off the commit.
the git push force will overwrite the branch.

👍

[sahil9001]

@AlfredoG87 can you check here? I don't have the option to ask for re-review :/

[AlfredoG87]

Looks good, just 2 nits.

PS: it would be cool if you can add some screenshots of the docker containers running, and its env context when running the docker compose with this change. You can put these screenshots on the PR Description under "Notes for reviewer" section.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.72%. Comparing base (7796aca) to head (bada091).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3107      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.16%   79.72%   -3.45%     
==========================================
  Files          63       65       +2     
  Lines        4236     4232       -4     
  Branches      830      840      +10     
==========================================
- Hits         3523     3374     -149     
- Misses        470      577     +107     
- Partials      243      281      +38     

Flag	Coverage Δ
config-service	100.00% <ø> (?)
relay	85.30% <ø> (-0.29%)	⬇️
server	?
ws-server	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 44 files with indirect coverage changes

[Nana-EC]

Hey @sahil9001 , thanks for your contribution, this is great.
You have some issues on your signing.
Please follow instructions here to ensure you've signed off.
All commits needs to be signed and signed off :)
More details in our Contributing Guide

[sahil9001]

Hey @sahil9001 , thanks for your contribution, this is great. You have some issues on your signing. Please follow instructions here to ensure you've signed off. All commits needs to be signed and signed off :) More details in our Contributing Guide

done buddy, thanks for this. I learnt this new thing today!

[AlfredoG87]

Don't forget to add a blank line at the end of the file. 👍

[sahil9001]

It is there @AlfredoG87 , is this correct?

[AlfredoG87]

LGTM!
TYVM for your contribution 💯

[AlfredoG87]

It is there @AlfredoG87 , is this correct?

No, as you can see you can still see the red warning sign. if the blank line has blank spaces (spaces) is no longer blank

[sahil9001]

It is there @AlfredoG87 , is this correct?

No, as you can see you can still see the red warning sign. if the blank line has blank spaces (spaces) is no longer blank

Fixed, is this eligible for hacktoberfest swags? @AlfredoG87

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[georgi-l95]

LG, tyvm for your contribution @sahil9001

[quiet-node]

Hello @sahil9001, we currently just pushed in an internal fix for the PR Check / Title Check. Could you please pull the latest changes from remote hashgraph:main to update your this forked branch?

[AlfredoG87]

LGTM

[sahil9001]

Hey @AlfredoG87, is this PR eligible for hacktoberfest swags?

[AlfredoG87]

@sahil9001 am not sure, but I would not see why not.

[sahil9001]

@AlfredoG87 I have not received any communication regarding the swags, can you check please?

[AlfredoG87]

I am sorry, that is not my department, probably the persons in charge are on PTO due to the holidays.
I will ask around next week that everyone is back and get back to you.

[sahil9001]

Thanks for the response!

[sahil9001]

Hey @AlfredoG87 , do we have any update on this?