Fix broken docs link

[eagoetz]

Closes #179

Simply change the broken link to one that works.

[eagoetz]

@duncanmmacleod What's the procedure for determining if docs changes work properly?

Also, it looks like https://gwsumm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ is woefully out of date (0.1.2!). How do we update this?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #340 (39f03ac) into master (39f03ac) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 39f03ac differs from pull request most recent head 5bb21cf. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5bb21cf to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #340   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.31%   50.31%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        8658     8658           
=======================================
  Hits         4356     4356           
  Misses       4302     4302           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux	50.31% <0.00%> (ø)
macOS	50.31% <0.00%> (ø)
python3.10	50.31% <0.00%> (ø)
python3.7	49.51% <0.00%> (ø)
python3.8	50.31% <0.00%> (ø)
python3.9	50.31% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

[duncanmmacleod]

@duncanmmacleod What's the procedure for determining if docs changes work properly?

Also, it looks like https://gwsumm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ is woefully out of date (0.1.2!). How do we update this?

I have resync'd the webhook used by readthedocs, which seems to have kickstarted the PR builds, which is the way to test the docs changes. This in turn exposes the docs failure responsible for the out-of-date docs.

[duncanmmacleod]

See #343 for a fix to the rtd builds.

[duncanmmacleod]

Verified as works, thanks @eagoetz.