-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create prepare-commit-msg #175
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new Git hook, No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughA new shell script has been introduced in the Changes
Poem
πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The prepare-commit-msg hook file appears to be empty. Please add the intended hook implementation.
- Please provide more detail in the PR description about what this commit hook is intended to do and how it will be used.
- The documentation checkbox is marked as updated, but no documentation changes are visible in the PR. Please include the documentation updates or correct the checkbox.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π’ Security: all looks good
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects π
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Nitpick comments (6)
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg (6)
1-5
: Consider enhancing documentation with usage examples.The documentation clearly explains the purpose and bypass mechanism. Consider adding examples of:
- Expected commit message format
- How to install the required tool
- Common usage scenarios
18-30
: Add file permission checks.While the file existence check is good, consider also verifying that the file is writable to prevent failures during message writing.
if [ ! -f "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" ]; then echo "Error: Commit message file '$COMMIT_MSG_FILE' not found" >&2 exit 1 fi +if [ ! -w "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" ]; then + echo "Error: Commit message file '$COMMIT_MSG_FILE' is not writable" >&2 + exit 1 +fi
32-37
: Make backup file path unique.To prevent potential conflicts in concurrent operations, consider using a unique backup file name, perhaps including the process ID.
-cp "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" +cp "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.$$"
38-42
: Improve error handling and logging.Consider capturing and logging the actual error message from the tool instead of suppressing it with 2>/dev/null. This would help in troubleshooting issues.
-if ! AI_MESSAGE=$(dotnet-aicommitmessage generate-message -m "$CURRENT_MESSAGE" 2>/dev/null); then - echo "Error: Failed to generate AI commit message. Using original message." >&2 +if ! AI_MESSAGE=$(dotnet-aicommitmessage generate-message -m "$CURRENT_MESSAGE" 2>&1); then + echo "Error: Failed to generate AI commit message: $AI_MESSAGE" >&2
50-56
: Update backup file references if implementing unique backup paths.If implementing the earlier suggestion for unique backup paths, ensure to update all references to the backup file in this section.
if ! echo "$AI_MESSAGE" > "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" 2>/dev/null; then echo "Error: Failed to write new commit message" >&2 - cp "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" - rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" + cp "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.$$" "$COMMIT_MSG_FILE" + rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.$$"
58-60
: Update backup file cleanup if implementing unique backup paths.If implementing the earlier suggestion for unique backup paths, update the cleanup command accordingly.
-rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.bak" +rm "${COMMIT_MSG_FILE}.$$"
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (1)
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg
(1 hunks)
π Additional comments (3)
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg (3)
6-9
: LGTM! Clean implementation of the bypass mechanism.The environment variable check is well-implemented with proper early exit.
44-48
: LGTM! Thorough message validation.The empty and whitespace-only message checks are well-implemented.
11-16
: Verify tool availability in CI/CD pipelines.The tool availability check is well-implemented with helpful error messages. Ensure that CI/CD pipelines have the tool installed if commit message verification is part of the workflow.
β Verification successful
Local-only commit message verification is appropriate
The git hook's local implementation is correct. Commit message verification tools are best used as developer aids during local development, rather than CI/CD blockers. The current implementation helps developers write better commits while avoiding potential CI pipeline disruptions.
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the tool is mentioned in any CI configuration files rg -l "dotnet-aicommitmessage" .github/workflows/Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if GitHub Actions workflows exist echo "=== GitHub Actions Workflows ===" fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ echo -e "\n=== Other CI Configurations ===" # Check for other CI configuration files fd -e yml -e yaml -e json . -E .github/workflows | grep -iE 'azure|gitlab|circleci|jenkins|travis|appveyor|bitbucket' echo -e "\n=== Dotnet Tool References ===" # Look for dotnet tool references in any YAML/JSON files rg -l "dotnet tool" -g "*.{yml,yaml,json}"Length of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check AppVeyor configuration echo "=== AppVeyor Configuration ===" cat appveyor.yml echo -e "\n=== GitHub Actions Commit-Related Steps ===" # Look for commit-related steps in GitHub Actions rg -l "commit" .github/workflows/Length of output: 4727
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
β Build ViaCEP 4.2.71 completed (commit c4a0ae9587 by @guibranco) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests β
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #175 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 34 34
=========================================
Hits 34 34 β View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
β Build ViaCEP 4.2.82 completed (commit 7db54545d1 by @gstraccini[bot]) |
|
π Description
Create prepare-commit-msg
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Summary by Sourcery
Build:
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add a
prepare-commit-msg
Git hook script to automatically generate AI-powered commit messages usingdotnet-aicommitmessage
, with an option to bypass.Why are these changes being made?
The introduction of an AI-powered commit message generator aims to improve the quality and consistency of commit messages by leveraging automated suggestions. This tool streamlines the commit process for contributors by providing instant commit message templates, which can be bypassed if needed for manual input (e.g., through an environment variable). This approach ensures that both automated and manual commit processes are supported, with checks in place to prevent failure even if the tool is not available.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores