[teleport-update] Fix usage of trace #49388
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eeaab53 to
9f5117e
Compare
71c7832 to
80316ba
Compare
vapopov
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2024
dustinspecker
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
|
This is really good to know about. I've been using |
hugoShaka
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
80316ba to
0375872
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@hugoShaka pointed out to me that
trace.Errorfdoes not accurately record stack traces when used to wrap errors. This PR migratesteleport-updatefromtrace.Errorftotrace.Wrapfor error wrapping.The
teleport-updatebinary will be used to enable, disable, and trigger automatic Teleport agent updates. The new auto-updates system manages a local installation of the cluster-specified version of Teleport stored in/var/lib/teleport/versions.RFD: #47126
Goal (internal): https://github.com/gravitational/cloud/issues/10289