Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport: ensure that disconnects propagate through port-forwarded tunnel #3873

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2020

Conversation

awly
Copy link
Contributor

@awly awly commented Jun 23, 2020

This is a backport of #3801 into 4.3

When a client terminates, it should propagate over to the server on
remote host without it attempting to write. The defered cleanup wasn't
closing all the right connections to make this happen.

When a server terminates, re-execed teleport might not notice until
client sends new data. Re-execed teleport should exit on first observed
error in either direction and not wait for both ends.

Fixes #3749

When a client terminates, it should propagate over to the server on
remote host without it attempting to write. The defered cleanup wasn't
closing all the right connections to make this happen.

When a server terminates, re-execed teleport might not notice until
client sends new data. Re-execed teleport should exit on first observed
error in either direction and not wait for both ends.

Fixes #3749
@awly awly force-pushed the andrew/4.3/portforward-close-conns branch from 0ef4eac to 3821f76 Compare June 24, 2020 21:14
@awly awly merged commit 571fc03 into branch/4.3 Jun 25, 2020
@awly awly deleted the andrew/4.3/portforward-close-conns branch June 25, 2020 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants