Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(fluentd): resolve rubocop failures #6359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

taharah
Copy link
Contributor

@taharah taharah commented Jun 10, 2022

Signed-off-by: Trevor Wood Trevor.G.Wood@gmail.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
Resolves all of the Rubocop linting failures for the fluentd plugin.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

  • Documentation added
  • Tests updated
  • Is this an important fix or new feature? Add an entry in the CHANGELOG.md.
  • Changes that require user attention or interaction to upgrade are documented in docs/sources/upgrading/_index.md

Signed-off-by: Trevor Wood <Trevor.G.Wood@gmail.com>
@taharah taharah requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2022 05:03
@grafanabot
Copy link
Collaborator

./tools/diff_coverage.sh ../loki-main/test_results.txt test_results.txt ingester,distributor,querier,querier/queryrange,iter,storage,chunkenc,logql,loki

Change in test coverage per package. Green indicates 0 or positive change, red indicates that test coverage for a package fell.

+           ingester	0%
+        distributor	0%
+            querier	0%
+ querier/queryrange	0%
+               iter	0%
+            storage	0%
+           chunkenc	0%
+              logql	0%
+               loki	0%

@dannykopping
Copy link
Contributor

I compiled a gist with the before/after:
https://gist.github.com/dannykopping/6732dcda3d4f12a118752936196f4663

Copy link
Contributor

@dannykopping dannykopping left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks for another excellent PR @taharah!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants