Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(blooms): Builder retrieves tasks from planner #13046

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

salvacorts
Copy link
Contributor

@salvacorts salvacorts commented May 28, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds the logic to the bloom builder to connect and receive tasks from the bloom planner. Tasks are not processed yet, only received.

Special notes for your reviewer:

  • Retry mechanism s will be implemented on a different PR

Checklist

  • Reviewed the CONTRIBUTING.md guide (required)
  • Documentation added
  • Tests updated
  • Title matches the required conventional commits format, see here
    • Note that Promtail is considered to be feature complete, and future development for logs collection will be in Grafana Alloy. As such, feat PRs are unlikely to be accepted unless a case can be made for the feature actually being a bug fix to existing behavior.
  • Changes that require user attention or interaction to upgrade are documented in docs/sources/setup/upgrade/_index.md
  • For Helm chart changes bump the Helm chart version in production/helm/loki/Chart.yaml and update production/helm/loki/CHANGELOG.md and production/helm/loki/README.md. Example PR
  • If the change is deprecating or removing a configuration option, update the deprecated-config.yaml and deleted-config.yaml files respectively in the tools/deprecated-config-checker directory. Example PR

@salvacorts salvacorts changed the title Salvacorts/bloom refactor/builder pull task refactor(blooms): Builder retrieves tasks from planner May 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories label May 28, 2024
@salvacorts salvacorts marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2024 10:40
@salvacorts salvacorts requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2024 10:40
// will be canceled and the loop will exit.
protoTask, err := c.Recv()
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(c.Context().Err(), context.Canceled) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you should check err for context.Canceled, or, check if c.Context() == nil before c.Recv()

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the connection context is canceled, c.Recv() will return right after calling it.
(I actually had it as you suggest but noticed the behaviour while testing and decided to remove it for simplicity)

Subsystem: metricsSubsystem,
Name: "task_time_seconds",
Help: "Time spent processing a task.",
Buckets: prometheus.DefBuckets,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The default bucket range might be too small.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed. Changed

Name: "task_completed_total",
Help: "Total number of task completed",
}, []string{"status"}),
taskTime: promauto.With(r).NewHistogramVec(prometheus.HistogramOpts{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: would name it taskDuration

@salvacorts salvacorts merged commit ab7af05 into main May 29, 2024
60 checks passed
@salvacorts salvacorts deleted the salvacorts/bloom-refactor/builder-pull-task branch May 29, 2024 12:18
@chaudum chaudum mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/L type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants