-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support symbol #46
Comments
If I look at our noto-emoji svgs, I see that of the 97 files that contain the Now I wonder if we actually need to bother implementing this, also given that
I'm tempted to simply warn and drop them.. |
nanoemoji does not support <symbol> elements yet. Some noto-emoji .svg files contain unused <symbol> elements (without an id attribute), which makes nanoemoji unhappy. I created a branch on noto-emoji repository called 'drop-symbol-elements' and here I am pointing the submodule to that branch. This unblocks googlefonts/picosvg#46
nanoemoji does not support `<symbol>` elements yet. googlefonts/picosvg#46 Some noto-emoji .svg files contain unused `<symbol>` elements (without an `id` attribute), which make nanoemoji unhappy. I created a branch on noto-emoji repository called 'drop-symbol-elements' and here I am pointing our submodule to that branch. We shall use noto-emoji master branch once that patch will be merged upstream.ymbol-elements' branch
This may have been an issue with old svg export; I see less symbol fails in the latest noto-emoji (googlefonts/color-fonts#10 (comment)). If we're lucky the ones that are left simply need to be re-exported :) |
I guess regardless removing anonymous (or if we feel fancy, unreferenced) symbols seems safe |
I'm now seeing cases where we get Symbols that appear to actually be used in Adobe Illustrator exported svgs so we may need to implement this. |
Resolve
<symbol>
when producing a picosvgThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: