-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🔥 Feature: Add Req and Res API #2894
Merged
+1,501
−1,097
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
85f5e09
🔥 feat: add Req and Res interfaces
nickajacks1 4b3dc9a
Merge branch 'main' into reqres
gaby cf05889
Merge branch 'main' into reqres
gaby 2b891e8
fix(req,res): several issues
nickajacks1 3a8f64a
docs: organize Ctx methods by request and response
nickajacks1 bb91f32
feat(req,res): sync more missed methods
nickajacks1 64dd9bb
Merge branch 'main' into reqres
gaby File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test coverage for the Res() method
The review comment is correct. The codebase search reveals that while there are interface and implementation definitions for
Res
, there is no direct test coverage for theRes()
method ofDefaultCtx
. A test should be added to verify that:res
fieldRes
interface🔗 Analysis chain
Add test coverage for the Res() method
While the implementation is correct and the documentation is clear, test coverage is missing for this method. Please add unit tests to ensure the method correctly returns the res field.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for this method?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 83
Script:
Length of output: 2109
Script:
Length of output: 620
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1476-1477: ctx.go#L1476-L1477
Added lines #L1476 - L1477 were not covered by tests