Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement BuyYes and BuyNo functions with Omen API #54

Merged

Conversation

evangriffiths
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

limit=5,
)

markets: list[OmenAgentMarket] = get_omen_binary_markets()
market_questions_and_prices = []
for market in markets:
market_questions_and_prices.append(market.question)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe just a style preference, but I would prefer having some kind of tuple structure, like [(market_price, market_question)] instead of a list containing different item types. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, is there a reason why we can't use some Pydantic model here?

This seems like it could work:

from pydantic import BaseModel


class MicroMarket(BaseModel):
    question: str
    p_yes: float

    def __str__(self) -> str:
        return f"'{self.question}' with probability of yes: {self.p_yes:.2%}"


mm = MicroMarket(question="Will it rain tomorrow?", p_yes=0.7)

prompt = f"""
You have following markets:

- {mm}
"""

print(prompt)

prints:

> python test.py                                                                                                                             [9:44:12]

You have following markets:

- 'Will it rain tomorrow?' with probability of yes: 70.00%

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, will do this!

I think this is still a starting point though, and we might want to do some thinking/experimenting how we want the api to look like for the agent. We could expose a bunch more things (opening time, closing time, liquidity, ...), either as extra fields of this pydantic class, or as separate Functions the agent can call.

My hunch is that separate functions makes more sense for token efficiency, but need to check.

Also, we could expose just the market Id here, and have the agent pass that into the other getter functions, so that we don't need get_omen_market_by_title here https://github.com/gnosis/prediction-market-agent-tooling/pull/172/files.

return ["Will Joe Biden get reelected in 2024?", 2.3]

def __call__(self, market: str, amount: float) -> str:
if self.outcome == "yes":
Copy link
Contributor

@kongzii kongzii Apr 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, fixed.

@kongzii
Copy link
Contributor

kongzii commented Apr 9, 2024

I see it currently uses Omen-specific classes/functions a lot, are you planning on having this deployable against Manifold as well? As we do with others?

@evangriffiths
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see it currently uses Omen-specific classes/functions a lot, are you planning on having this deployable against Manifold as well?

Yes, would like to support all markets we support. Once we figure out the set of Functions the agent needs, we can make them members of the AgentMarket base class. Haven't done that yet, because that's still in flux.

I would say that there isn't the same incentive to use manifold here because it's free, as for this agent I think token cost >> betting cost

@evangriffiths evangriffiths merged commit f6d5e5c into 48-first-steps-towards-general-agent-1n Apr 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@evangriffiths evangriffiths deleted the evan/buy-yes-no branch April 9, 2024 10:09
gabrielfior added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
* Added getMarkets function and passed it to agent

* First commit for microchain agent (#52)

* First commit with microchain agent

* Separate out functions to separate file

* Mypy and formatting

* Formatting

* Use branch of microchain that contains token-tracking functionality (#53)

* Use branch of microchain that contains token-tracking functionality

* Formatting

* Review comment

* Implement BuyYes and BuyNo functions with Omen API (#54)

* Implement BuyYes and BuyNo functions with Omen API

* Remove 'general_agent'

---------

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Fior <fior.gbm@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants