We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This can be closed now. The only failing checks from repo-review are - PY007: Supports an easy task runner (nox or tox) We don't want this as our testing infrastructure is simple enough. I'm not sure if I agree with this, tox is very simple to set up (not used nox myself). But I agree it is not urgent either way.
This can be closed now. The only failing checks from repo-review are - PY007: Supports an easy task runner (nox or tox) We don't want this as our testing infrastructure is simple enough.
This can be closed now. The only failing checks from repo-review are -
We don't want this as our testing infrastructure is simple enough.
I'm not sure if I agree with this, tox is very simple to set up (not used nox myself). But I agree it is not urgent either way.
tox
nox
Originally posted by @paddyroddy in #187 (comment)
PS: I personally prefer nox because you can sepcify everything in plain Python, but I use both, so no strong opinions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gh-283: set up nox for deveopers and CI
080874e
195be0c
8d60359
a1f5e14
Saransh-cpp
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Originally posted by @paddyroddy in #187 (comment)
PS: I personally prefer
nox
because you can sepcify everything in plain Python, but I use both, so no strong opinions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: