Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add support for EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct model #8991

Closed
4 tasks done
chris-jaehoon opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #9025
Closed
4 tasks done

Feature Request: Add support for EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct model #8991

chris-jaehoon opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #9025
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@chris-jaehoon
Copy link

Prerequisites

  • I am running the latest code. Mention the version if possible as well.
  • I carefully followed the README.md.
  • I searched using keywords relevant to my issue to make sure that I am creating a new issue that is not already open (or closed).
  • I reviewed the Discussions, and have a new and useful enhancement to share.

Feature Description

please add new model EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct

Motivation

llama.cpp for new model

Possible Implementation

No response

@chris-jaehoon chris-jaehoon added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 12, 2024
@chris-jaehoon chris-jaehoon changed the title Feature Request: EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct model addition Feature Request: Add support for EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct model Aug 12, 2024
@mscheong01
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm planning to work on this next week 😄

@MoonRide303
Copy link

I've noticed draft of the solution on HF discussion - might be useful:
https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-3.0-7.8B-Instruct/discussions/8#66bae61b1893d14ee8ed85bb

@mscheong01
Copy link
Collaborator

@MoonRide303 I've added the chat template written in the discussion. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants