Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Add support of client report #552

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

lucas-zimerman
Copy link
Collaborator

@lucas-zimerman lucas-zimerman commented Jan 24, 2024

This PR implements the support of Client Report to Sentry Capacitor

#skip-changelog

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it.

But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you label it Status: Backlog or Status: In Progress, I will leave it alone ... forever!


"A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀

@lucas-zimerman lucas-zimerman changed the base branch from feat/client to bump/7.100.1 February 15, 2024 16:43
@lucas-zimerman lucas-zimerman marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2024 16:50
@lucas-zimerman lucas-zimerman changed the base branch from bump/7.100.1 to fix/client-outcome February 16, 2024 11:27
@krystofwoldrich krystofwoldrich changed the title Feat: Add support to client report Feat: Add support of client report Feb 16, 2024
src/client.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/client.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
version: SDK_VERSION,
},
]);
/* TODO: Fix SDKInfo
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L: From what I see this is unrelated to the PR, looks like only the indentation changed.

What needs to be fixed with SDKInfo?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah only the indentation changed.

I made a PR only for SDKInfo separately just to avoid fixing everything on a single PR.

It's basically missing the default export from the SDK on the integration.

Copy link
Member

@krystofwoldrich krystofwoldrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, the same impl as RN,
I have noticed one small typo, otherwise, it's good to go! 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants