You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The 'Parse IP range' operation currently accepts inputs in either CIDR notation (10.0.0.0/29) or range notation (10.0.0.0 - 10.0.0.7).
It would be useful if it could accept a list of IPs and calculate the smallest subnet which covers them all. This would simply be a matter of finding the smallest and largest IPs and constructing a range between them. e.g. the following input would generate the same output as the two examples above:
Would this be a better improvement for 'Group IP Addresses' with a parameter to calculate smallest subnet instead of user selecting a predefined subnet?
That's certainly a possibility, but the point of the 'Group IP addresses' operation is that you can create multiple groups depending on a specific subnet size. If you want to just group the whole lot into one subnet, I think it fits the 'Parse IP addresses' operation a bit better.
Summary
The 'Parse IP range' operation currently accepts inputs in either CIDR notation (10.0.0.0/29) or range notation (10.0.0.0 - 10.0.0.7).
It would be useful if it could accept a list of IPs and calculate the smallest subnet which covers them all. This would simply be a matter of finding the smallest and largest IPs and constructing a range between them. e.g. the following input would generate the same output as the two examples above:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: