-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
problem in ´continuity´ when extracting ROIs #12
Comments
Did you try to disable the drift correction ? Do you still get this error ? |
indeed, by disabling drift correction the error went away. but with drift
correction on, i got it sometimes (and almost in every roi the last run
before i opened this ticket)
david
El dj., 8 de des. 2022, 16:40, Gilles Charvin ***@***.***> va
escriure:
… Did you try to disable the drift correction ? Do you still get this error ?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AP6IC44NXIZ6K4AIEASWV3LWMH6P3ANCNFSM6AAAAAARAZXQE4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
OK. If it does not drift too much, I think you should keep going without drift correction (the network is somewhat robust with respect to XY translation), until I find a way to make the correction more reliable... |
yeah, luckily our movies are quite stable usually. also, skipping drift
correction speeds up the process a lot. in the begining i was applying it
because i felt it was 'more correct' but it's not necessary most of the
times actually
david
El dj., 8 de des. 2022, 16:56, Gilles Charvin ***@***.***> va
escriure:
… OK. If it does not drift too much, I think you should keep going without
drift correction (the network is somewhat robust with respect to XY
translation), until I find a way to make the correction more reliable...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AP6IC42DNYI5UNQJZ5A3WADWMIAJTANCNFSM6AAAAAARAZXQE4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I agree, it s quite useless in the end because objects don t need to be tracked over time anyway... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
hi,

i´ve noticed in this last batch i processed that the ROIs after extraction make sudden ´jumps´ into different ROIs (i assume within the same fov). i saw this happening before but just for a few timepoints and then it went back to the original ROI (i´ll recheck that again anyway, just in case it was worse than i thought originally), but now i´m seing that after a bit of back and forth, the ROI is being actually switced. within the same fov, the jump is happening at the same time position across different ROIs, but it´s happeing at different time points in each fov.
there´s no error messages popping out, so maybe it´s a problem of my setup? im reading and saving the images in an external hard drive via USB, maybe the data transfer gets confused? i don´t think is that though, as the switched ROI is not centered as it is originally. for various examples i´ve seen, i doubt that the trap is the ´same one´, as sometimes it goes from a empty trap to a filled trap with a big cell inside already budded.. i´m attaching a couple of screenshot examples, just in case i didn´t explain myself enough (although i think in this case the cell is the same, but im not sure). we´d appreaciate any input on how to deal with this
thx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: