-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Emitter migration #1287
Emitter migration #1287
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1287 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 62.32% 62.31% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 278 277 -1
Lines 23242 23102 -140
==========================================
- Hits 14486 14396 -90
+ Misses 8756 8706 -50
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me. Add an entry to the migration guide?
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Migration guide updated in 9f7648a |
1 similar comment
Migration guide updated in 9f7648a |
hmm something is not quite right with the ubuntu build. The test failures don't look related to changes in this PR. I just triggered another build to double check. |
@osrf-jenkins run tests please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ubuntu build is better now. Don't think that the test failures are related.
🎉 Cleanup
Summary
During SubT we created a
particle_emitter2
plugin designed to replace theparticle_emitter
plugin. This PR takes the next steps toward having just one particle emitter system.I tried to make the series of commits easy to follow:
particle_emitter
directoryparticle_emitter2
toparticle_emitter
.particle_emitter
test files and example world.particle_emitter2
test files and example world toparticle_emitter
.emitter2
toemitter
inside the test files and example world.lrauv
world.Test it
Checklist
codecheck
passed (See contributing)Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining
Signed-off-by
messages.