This doesn't work yet - I mean, this is version 0.01.
The labour market is a two-sided market for lemons: there are many crap jobs, many crap candidates, and highly expensive and inaccurate measurement of quality on each side.
- What fraction of vacancies are bad?
- How many bad workers will an average organisation hire?
- How many bad jobs does an average worker take?
Bayesian approach: with an imperfect test (HR, Glassdoor) and huge sampling, how many false positives?
- Binary measure of quality: a job is good or job is bad, likewise candidates.
- Otherwise undifferentiated jobs and candidates. Equal pay, status. No licensing.
- Point estimate of turnover time
- De novo market: all jobs start unfilled
- Static size: No job destruction or creation.
- Accuracy of firms' vetting process is uniform and 0
- Accuracy of candidates' vetting process is uniform and 0.
- Disjoint quit/rehired period
- Good workers stay in good jobs.
- No experience variable
- No referral