Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(cast): Harden
cast send
and provide more accurate error messages #4874fix(cast): Harden
cast send
and provide more accurate error messages #4874Changes from 3 commits
5d1f696
a84ad35
0eca4ff
c511f56
10fab16
327d7b2
7da515e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is duplicated, can we extract a function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see #4874 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cast_send
is called twice.Since
cast_send
is our final intent, can we refactor to have just a call at the end of the fn block?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah the reason this is written like so is that
provider
actually takes different types depending if you have a signer or not, which will also affectfrom
and theeth_*
method used. We want to clearly differentiate when we're falling back toeth_sendTransaction
vs using a signer and usingeth_sendRawTransaction
, and so we have these two code paths. I actually think abstracting it all away so it looks like only one path could make this harder to reason about and could allow misleading error messages due to fall-through cases. Let me know what you think!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duplicated, see above
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Answered in #4874 (comment) — essentially want to keep these code paths simple instead of further abstracting them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this is where compatibility with dapptools on this functionality is broken. Happy to accomodate suggestions on how we want to handle this as keystores do not have the expected
address
property.