-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FontBureau profile for checks on proposed new variation axes #3130
Comments
@bghryct, please post here the contents of a textproto file for at least one of the newly proposed axes. The structure of such textproto files can be seen here: https://github.com/google/fonts/tree/fa38f09d14b5c976a5b0c140cdfbc562023fc38e/axisregistry |
|
I'm not sure if this is absolutely correct @felipesanches as I don't fully understand the fallback value meanings, or what precision means for that matter. Really appreciate you taking the time to walk me through fontbakery check writing this morning. Also I realize that the first line of the textproto file should reference a font project with the axis in use. I have a project using ytlc but it's not ready for the light of day, or the darkmode of github, yet. |
Check out these discussions about new custom axis registries; maybe they are of any help on the process, and you could participate also :) |
Includes a single check that validates the ytlc axis. As proposed by Font Bureau at https://variationsguide.typenetwork.com/ (issue fonttools#3130)
Includes a single check that validates the ytlc axis. As proposed by Font Bureau at https://variationsguide.typenetwork.com/ (issue fonttools#3130)
Includes a single check that validates the ytlc axis. As proposed by Type Network: at https://variationsguide.typenetwork.com/ (issue fonttools#3130)
Includes a single check that validates the ytlc axis. As proposed by Type Network: at https://variationsguide.typenetwork.com/ (issue #3130)
@bghryct, can you provide the textproto files for all other proposed axes? |
@felipe @vv-monsalve Where should I include the textproto files? |
you can send a PR adding them to this directory: |
@felipesanches |
I have just had a nice videocall with Mirko (@bghryct) in which he told me he's interested in implementing FontBakery checks for the new variation axes proposed here:
https://variationsguide.typenetwork.com/
I believe that we can use the same strategy that we're using for the gf-axis-registry checks by employing textproto files for those axes. But I would place these new axes on a separate profile (Mirko suggested to call it the
fontbureau
profile). If these axes are added to the GFAxisRegistry in the future, it would then be super easy to migrate the textproto files into thegooglefonts
profile.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: