-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Provider for Google Pub/Sub Topic #543
Conversation
7ee880d
to
ccffdf6
Compare
22cdfd8
to
de992b5
Compare
d8b2e66
to
508e814
Compare
508e814
to
555ea8c
Compare
03cb325
to
5801ba9
Compare
6300d88
to
5148b5c
Compare
9c377df
to
83f6109
Compare
83f6109
to
1fe8ed4
Compare
81428fc
to
72549b8
Compare
a7f236f
to
1be2577
Compare
It may be better to use a patch helper, similar to https://github.com/fluxcd/source-controller/blob/a0ff0cfa885e1e5f506a593a9de39174cf1dfeb8/internal/controller/common_test.go#L137-L140 . Receiver test has a lot of usage of Update() but that specific test fails with version conflict. It should be okay to update just that test for now.@matheuscscp can you give it a try as a separate commit? Just create a patch helper, set suspend directly on the object and call patch to update it. |
d51fd94
to
888bf5d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
The receiver related test failure is unrelated to these changes. That can be addressed here or separately.
c495985
to
888bf5d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Somtochi Onyekwere <somtochionyekwere@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Max Jonas Werner <makkes@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sunny <darkowlzz@protonmail.com>
888bf5d
to
04cea9d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job, @matheuscscp! lgtm
Fixes #539
.spec.address