[Release] Update versions for Release 10.18.0

[ncooke3]

[google-oss-bot]

	1 Warning
⚠️	Did you forget to add a changelog entry? (Add #no-changelog to the PR description to silence this warning.)

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[paulb777]

LGTM on acceptable CI

[TokenPayId]

1 Warning
⚠️ Did you forget to add a changelog entry? (Add #no-changelog to the PR description to silence this warning.)
Generated by 🚫 Danger

[google-oss-bot]

Coverage Report ¹

Affected Products

• FirebaseDynamicLinks-iOS-FirebaseDynamicLinks.framework

  Overall coverage changed from 61.52% (24be340) to 61.65% (b277f68) by +0.13%.

  Filename	Base (24be340)	Merge (b277f68)	Diff
  FIRDynamicLinks.m	71.30%	71.84%	+0.53%

• FirebaseFirestore-iOS-FirebaseFirestoreInternal.framework

  Overall coverage changed from 88.09% (24be340) to 88.17% (b277f68) by +0.08%.

  Filename	Base (24be340)	Merge (b277f68)	Diff
  exception.cc	23.68%	84.21%	+60.53%
  leveldb_key.cc	98.82%	98.43%	-0.39%
  ordered_code.cc	93.90%	94.39%	+0.49%

• FirebasePerformance-iOS-FirebasePerformance.framework

  Overall coverage changed from 94.76% (24be340) to 94.71% (b277f68) by -0.05%.

  Filename	Base (24be340)	Merge (b277f68)	Diff
  FPRGaugeManager.m	97.39%	95.42%	-1.96%

Test Logs

• Base (24be340): https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/actions/runs/6713319025
• Merge (b277f68): https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/actions/runs/6714556871

1. https://storage.googleapis.com/firebase-sdk-metric-reports/dRTjJN0ENQ.html

[ncooke3]

@paulb777, are the QS failures expected to you: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-ios-sdk/actions/runs/6714556874/job/18251238934?pr=12033

[ncooke3]

I see they affected the nightly zip as well. The error though seems to be Xcode related:

xcodebuild: error: Unable to find a destination matching the provided destination specifier:
		{ platform:iOS Simulator, OS:latest, name:iPhone 15 }

	The requested device could not be found because no available devices matched the request.

[paulb777]

No, but they're almost certainly a regression from #11983, so shouldn't block this PR. I'll investigate today.