Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: shed: Online export-car #9590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2022
Merged

feat: shed: Online export-car #9590

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2022

Conversation

magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

@magik6k magik6k commented Nov 4, 2022

Proposed Changes

Make lotus-shed export-car work on online nodes

Additional Info

$ ./lotus state get-actor f05
Address:        f05
Balance:        134827.875759811187127269 FIL
Nonce:          0
Code:           bafk2bzacediohrxkp2fbsl4yj4jlupjdkgsiwqb4zuezvinhdo2j5hrxco62q (fil/8/storagemarket)
Head:           bafy2bzacecqryedsccndhepiovpm7somjzblvwbb5gdeq2wqy6tbi52yhyejg

$ ./lotus-shed export-car actor.car bafy2bzacecqryedsccndhepiovpm7somjzblvwbb5gdeq2wqy6tbi52yhyejg
done 1.907 GiB

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@magik6k magik6k requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2022 11:47
@magik6k magik6k force-pushed the feat/online-exportcar branch from 2c5087e to a0e3111 Compare November 4, 2022 11:48
@magik6k magik6k merged commit 2d664c4 into master Nov 6, 2022
@magik6k magik6k deleted the feat/online-exportcar branch November 6, 2022 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants