Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport: 9153: detach storage on worker shutdown #9165

Merged

Conversation

shrenujbansal
Copy link
Contributor

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

Backporting #9153

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • All commits have a clear commit message.
  • The PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, INTERFACE BREAKING CHANGE, CONSENSUS BREAKING, build, chore, ci, docs,perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area: api, chain, state, vm, data transfer, market, mempool, message, block production, multisig, networking, paychan, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • This PR has tests for new functionality or change in behaviour
  • If new user-facing features are introduced, clear usage guidelines and / or documentation updates should be included in https://lotus.filecoin.io or Discussion Tutorials.
  • CI is green

@shrenujbansal shrenujbansal requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2022 16:07
@jennijuju
Copy link
Member

need make docsgen

@jennijuju jennijuju changed the title Release1.17.1/detach storage on worker shutdown backport: 9153: detach storage on worker shutdown Aug 12, 2022
@geoff-vball geoff-vball enabled auto-merge August 12, 2022 18:01
@jennijuju jennijuju disabled auto-merge August 12, 2022 18:48
@jennijuju jennijuju merged commit 8ecf6f3 into release/v1.17.1 Aug 12, 2022
@jennijuju jennijuju deleted the release1.17.1/detach-storage-on-worker-shutdown branch August 12, 2022 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants