-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: sched: Finalize* move selectors #8710
Conversation
0fce142
to
8c6cba7
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat/multi-sched #8710 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 40.88% 40.85% -0.04%
====================================================
Files 691 692 +1
Lines 75992 76046 +54
====================================================
- Hits 31068 31067 -1
- Misses 39563 39617 +54
- Partials 5361 5362 +1
|
Hello, we're currently testing the remote finalize feature against some Ubuntu w/ ZFS NAS systems - but having the worker and miner on
|
|
Same as you... |
Do you have solved this issue ? |
Related Issues
On top of #8700 (to avoid conflicts and for easier testing - those PRs make most sense together)
Proposed Changes
move
worker selector, which will strongly prefer workers which can perform a local move of data (they either have both storage paths locally, or already have the sector in the correct local path)