Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: curio: Cleanup proving config #11751

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

@magik6k magik6k commented Mar 20, 2024

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

This PR removes some fields from Curio Proving config section that were only relevant to lotus-miner

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • If the PR affects users (e.g., new feature, bug fix, system requirements change), update the CHANGELOG.md and add details to the UNRELEASED section.
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@magik6k magik6k force-pushed the feat/curio-config-cleanup branch from a20afc7 to 187194d Compare March 20, 2024 11:32
@magik6k magik6k marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2024 11:32
@snadrus snadrus merged commit b27c861 into master Apr 2, 2024
91 of 92 checks passed
@snadrus snadrus deleted the feat/curio-config-cleanup branch April 2, 2024 16:21
Nagaprasadvr pushed a commit to Nagaprasadvr/lotus that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants