Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lotus-shed miner-multisig add change-worker command #8280

Closed
5 of 15 tasks
spark8899 opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
5 of 15 tasks

lotus-shed miner-multisig add change-worker command #8280

spark8899 opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Kind: Enhancement

Comments

@spark8899
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • This is not a new feature or an enhancement to the Filecoin protocol. If it is, please open an FIP issue.
  • This is not a new feature request. If it is, please file a feature request instead.
  • This is not brainstorming ideas. If you have an idea you'd like to discuss, please open a new discussion on the lotus forum and select the category as Ideas.
  • I have a specific, actionable, and well motivated improvement to propose.

Lotus component

  • lotus daemon - chain sync
  • lotus miner - mining and block production
  • lotus miner/worker - sealing
  • lotus miner - proving(WindowPoSt)
  • lotus miner/market - storage deal
  • lotus miner/market - retrieval deal
  • lotus miner/market - data transfer
  • lotus client
  • lotus JSON-RPC API
  • lotus message management (mpool)
  • Other

Improvement Suggestion

The subcommand miner-multisig of lotus-shed lacks the change-worker function. The change-worker function requires the permission of onwer. If the onwer address is a multi-signature address, it is difficult to handle. Two subcommands can be added to enhance the modification of the multi-signature miner worker. address.

@rjan90
Copy link
Contributor

rjan90 commented Mar 28, 2022

Hey @spark8899!

Thanks for this issue and the PR. I see that you have gotten a feedback from the devs, and that parts of the code have been merged, so I´m closing this now.

Thanks again 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Kind: Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants