Julia 0.7

[femtotrader]

No description provided.

[femtotrader]

@iblis17 2 tests are still failling.
Any idea?

[iblislin]

I guess the new optimizer in 0.7 is conservative.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 96.875% when pulling 34e7dd2 on update_julia_0.7 into e388ea6 on master.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #45 into master will increase coverage by 0.64%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #45      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.22%   96.87%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         106       96      -10     
==========================================
- Hits          102       93       -9     
+ Misses          4        3       -1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/TimeFrames.jl	96.87% <100%> (+0.64%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e388ea6...34e7dd2. Read the comment docs.

[iblislin]

there are still some depwarns, seems femtocleaner missed the case of range?

   Testing TimeFrames
 Resolving package versions...
Test Summary:            | Pass  Total
low level (period frame) |   16     16
┌ Warning: `range(start, step, length)` is deprecated, use `range(start, step=step, length=length)` instead.
│   caller = range(::DateTime, ::DatePeriodFrame{Day}, ::Int64) at TimeFrames.jl:270
└ @ TimeFrames ~/.julia/dev/TimeFrames/src/TimeFrames.jl:270
┌ Warning: `range(start, step, length)` is deprecated, use `range(start, step=step, length=length)` instead.
│   caller = range(::DatePeriodFrame{Day}, ::DateTime, ::Int64) at TimeFrames.jl:274
└ @ TimeFrames ~/.julia/dev/TimeFrames/src/TimeFrames.jl:274
┌ Warning: InexactError now supports arguments, use `InexactError(funcname::Symbol, ::Type, value)` instead.
│   caller = ip:0x0
└ @ Core :-1
Test Summary: | Pass  Total
high level    |  163    163
   Testing TimeFrames tests passed

[femtotrader]

Thanks @iblis17
I will tackle depwarns in an other PR