Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5932

adamretter · 2019-10-16T18:20:59Z

Subsumes #5928

adamretter · 2019-10-19T09:03:20Z

Hey @HouBingjian @guyuqi @cnqpzhang @wangxiyuan @Zhiwei-Dai, Travis-CI now offers builds on Arm64 based machines.

Good news - I have added this to our .travis.yml: https://travis-ci.org/facebook/rocksdb/builds/599829524?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification

We have two test cases which are failing on Arm64: JOB_NAME=platform_dependent, and TEST_GROUP=4. I don't have a great deal of ARM expertise, would one (or more) of you be willing to take a look?

The TEST_GROUP=1 is also failing, but only due to a lack of Disk Space (10GB) in the ARM64 containers, I have opened an issue with Travis and they will hopefully provide a new image build this coming week that has a larger Disk quota.

wangxiyuan · 2019-10-21T02:51:44Z

@adamretter good news. Looking forward for ARM support. And @Yikun can help with the ARM problem. some of the errors is included in the issues I created before.

#5736
#5751

If you need arm VM for debugging, please let us know. We can provide for you.

Yikun · 2019-10-21T02:59:52Z

The TEST_GROUP=4 problem is due to #5736 . And JOB_NAME=platform_dependent problem looks like a new problem.

guyuqi · 2019-10-21T10:34:30Z

TEST_GROUP=4 : failed in db_universal_compaction_test.

I also run the db_universal_compaction_test in my local environments and every tests cases in db_universal_compaction_test are ok:

builder@vm-rocksdb-yq:~/rocksdb$ ./db_universal_compaction_test
[==========] Running 147 tests from 5 test cases.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 5 tests from DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.BasicL0toL1
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.BasicL0toL1 (1190 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.SingleLevel
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.SingleLevel (972 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.MultipleLevels
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.MultipleLevels (2210 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.OverlappingL0
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.OverlappingL0 (1093 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.IngestBehind
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction.IngestBehind (984 ms)
[----------] 5 tests from DBTestUniversalDeleteTrigCompaction (6449 ms total)

[----------] 126 tests from UniversalCompactionNumLevels/DBTestUniversalCompaction
DBTestUniversalCompactionParallel/DBTestUniversalCompactionParallel.PickByFileNumberBug/1 (6588 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from DBTestUniversalCompactionParallel/DBTestUniversalCompactionParallel (47709 ms total)
.....................
.................
.............

[----------] 4 tests from DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/0
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/0 (3238 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/1
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/1 (3038 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/2
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/2 (2828 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/3
[       OK ] DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId.ManualCompactionOutputPathId/3 (3184 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId/DBTestUniversalManualCompactionOutputPathId (12288 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 147 tests from 5 test cases ran. (2159491 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 147 tests.

And the db_properties_test are passed which failed in #5736

builder@vm-rocksdb-yq:~/rocksdb$ ./db_properties_test
[==========] Running 21 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 21 tests from DBPropertiesTest
[ RUN      ] DBPropertiesTest.Empty
[       OK ] DBPropertiesTest.Empty (37985 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBPropertiesTest.CurrentVersionNumber
.............
..........
.......
[ RUN      ] DBPropertiesTest.SstFilesSize
[       OK ] DBPropertiesTest.SstFilesSize (951 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBPropertiesTest.MinObsoleteSstNumberToKeep
[       OK ] DBPropertiesTest.MinObsoleteSstNumberToKeep (1329 ms)
[ RUN      ] DBPropertiesTest.BlockCacheProperties
[       OK ] DBPropertiesTest.BlockCacheProperties (1095 ms)
[----------] 21 tests from DBPropertiesTest (359952 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 21 tests from 1 test case ran. (359952 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 21 tests.

But the bloom_test failed:

builder@vm-rocksdb-yq:~/rocksdb$ ./bloom_test
[==========] Running 11 tests from 2 test cases.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from BloomTest
[ RUN      ] BloomTest.EmptyFilter
[       OK ] BloomTest.EmptyFilter (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] BloomTest.Small
[       OK ] BloomTest.Small (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] BloomTest.VaryingLengths
False positives:  0.23% @ length =      1 ; bytes =      9
...............
.............
..........
......
....
[ RUN      ] FullBloomTest.RawSchema
[       OK ] FullBloomTest.RawSchema (0 ms)
[ RUN      ] FullBloomTest.CorruptFilters
bloom_test: util/bloom.cc:288: virtual rocksdb::FilterBitsReader* rocksdb::{anonymous}::BloomFilterPolicy::GetFilterBitsReader(const rocksdb::Slice&) const: Assertion `num_probes <= 127' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

wangxiyuan · 2019-10-29T07:06:02Z

db_properties_test passed in my last test. I removed it in my issue.
db_universal_compaction_test still failed the same as Travis CI shown.

adamretter · 2019-10-29T10:06:16Z

@wangxiyuan I also just rebased to bring in any recent changes.

pdillinger · 2019-12-05T19:27:20Z

Things may have stabilized a bit for release (including #6024). I just did "make check" on master (f32a311) on our ARM64 instance on EC2, and only folly_synchronization_distributed_mutex_test failed consistently. Added PR #6126 for that.

Inconsistent failures:

I got an intermittent failure in column_family_test that hasn't reproduced.
I have PR Use SpecialSkipListFactory in RecalculateScoreAfterPicking #6125 for DBTestUniversalCompaction

…6126) Summary: This test is crashing on ARM but is not yet production code. Let's not let it block ARM CI. See PR #5932 Pull Request resolved: #6126 Test Plan: ./folly_synchronization_distributed_mutex_test, on Linux/ARM, on Linux/x86_64, and with LITE=1 on Linux/x86_64 (also disabled) Differential Revision: D18836576 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: d8a36eea2f048e8330411d994435d1c58a15d978

wangxiyuan · 2019-12-10T02:46:54Z

@pdillinger Thanks for your fix. Could you take a look at #5751 ?
It's a failure for make jtest on aarch64.

adamretter · 2019-12-10T08:46:02Z

Thanks @pdillinger I have now rebased this on your fixes, let's see how she flies now...

adamretter · 2019-12-10T11:20:35Z

Now just a single failure in c_test::filter

wangxiyuan · 2019-12-11T03:10:08Z

Closed #5751 it's passed now.

wangxiyuan · 2019-12-11T03:13:20Z

@adamretter Cool, make jtest passed on my ubuntu16.04 arm env as well.

But when I ran make jtest on ubuntu18.04, it failed with:

java: db/file_indexer.cc:71: void rocksdb::FileIndexer::GetNextLevelIndex(size_t, size_t, int, int, int32_t*, int32_t*) const: Assertion `*left_bound <= *right_bound + 1' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Makefile:306: recipe for target 'run_test' failed
make[1]: *** [run_test] Error 134
make[1]: Leaving directory '/opt/rocksdb/java'
Makefile:2029: recipe for target 'jtest' failed
make: *** [jtest] Error 2

the java version is the same

openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_222-8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~18.04.1-b10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode)

But the gcc is not (it's 5.4.0 on ubuntu16.04):

gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1) 7.4.0
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

pdillinger · 2019-12-11T17:33:36Z

Now just a single failure in c_test::filter

Ah, I know why. Different legacy filter schema on ARM due to cache line size. Will prepare a PR

adamretter · 2019-12-11T17:51:00Z

@wangxiyuan it would probably be useful to examine the stack trace

Summary: This test was recently updated but failed to account for Bloom schema variance by CACHE_LINE_SIZE. (Since CACHE_LINE_SIZE is not defined in our C code, the test now simply allows a valid result for any CACHE_LINE_SIZE, not just the current one.) Unblock #5932 Pull Request resolved: #6153 Test Plan: ran unit test with builds TEST_CACHE_LINE_SIZE=128, =256, and unset (64 on Intel) Differential Revision: D18936015 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: e5e3852f95283d34d624632c1ae8d3adb2f2662c

…acebook#6126) Summary: This test is crashing on ARM but is not yet production code. Let's not let it block ARM CI. See PR facebook#5932 Pull Request resolved: facebook#6126 Test Plan: ./folly_synchronization_distributed_mutex_test, on Linux/ARM, on Linux/x86_64, and with LITE=1 on Linux/x86_64 (also disabled) Differential Revision: D18836576 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: d8a36eea2f048e8330411d994435d1c58a15d978

Summary: This test was recently updated but failed to account for Bloom schema variance by CACHE_LINE_SIZE. (Since CACHE_LINE_SIZE is not defined in our C code, the test now simply allows a valid result for any CACHE_LINE_SIZE, not just the current one.) Unblock facebook#5932 Pull Request resolved: facebook#6153 Test Plan: ran unit test with builds TEST_CACHE_LINE_SIZE=128, =256, and unset (64 on Intel) Differential Revision: D18936015 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: e5e3852f95283d34d624632c1ae8d3adb2f2662c

JunHe77 · 2020-02-13T05:46:25Z

I tried TEST_GROUP=platform_dependent on local Arm64 host with Ubuntu-16.04 of different modes (VM, docker, LXD), and passed DBWALTest.TruncateLastLogAfterRecoverWithoutFlush test in all of them.
A simple log is added to db_wal_test.cc to find logfile info, on local Arm platform, it outputed:
fsize:27 blocks:35992 blocksz: 4096
But on Travis it outputed:
fsize:27 blocks:1 blocksz: 512
Not sure if this is a Travis related issue (I knew little about TravisCI file system). But from what described here, and the failed test is file system dependent, it might be helpful to check with Travis guys.

JunHe77 · 2020-02-13T06:00:12Z

I created a topic in Travis. Welcome to comment. 😃
Tested platform_independent case using drone.io's Arm platform and the result is good:
https://cloud.drone.io/JunHe77/rocksdb/1/1/2

pdillinger · 2020-03-13T03:49:16Z

Using #6436 instead

Summary: This patch based on #5932 offers a better solution to add arm64 to TravisCI matrix. Really thank adamretter for initiating Arm CI setup. Difference comparing to amd64: 1. For CMake, as no official arm64 release ready on Kitware page, a third party (conda-forge) released one is used instead of building from source. The main reason is to save CI time. 2. Explicit export JAVA_HOME on arm64 3. Disable mingw test Signed-off-by: Yuqi Gu <yuqi.gu@arm.com> Pull Request resolved: #6436 Differential Revision: D20428505 Pulled By: pdillinger fbshipit-source-id: 81ef02435e41480bb71710b783d85ebf452ce926

adamretter added the arm label Oct 16, 2019

facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed label Oct 16, 2019

adamretter mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2019

Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5928

Closed

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch 5 times, most recently from 52354c9 to bdef03c Compare October 18, 2019 20:36

adamretter requested a review from siying October 19, 2019 08:50

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch from bdef03c to f0e26ca Compare October 29, 2019 10:05

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch from f0e26ca to 49d37a8 Compare November 24, 2019 19:06

pdillinger mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2019

Disable folly_synchronization_distributed_mutex_test on ARM for now #6126

Closed

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch from 49d37a8 to 4f0d984 Compare December 10, 2019 08:45

pdillinger mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2019

Fix c_test:filter for various CACHE_LINE_SIZEs #6153

Closed

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch 2 times, most recently from f0bed2b to eaa8758 Compare December 14, 2019 20:56

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch from eaa8758 to 35bfc1c Compare December 20, 2019 21:18

adamretter mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2019

DBWALTest.TruncateLastLogAfterRecoverWithoutFlush fails on arm64 and s390x #6236

Open

guyuqi mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2020

CI: add Arm support to travis CI matrix #6436

Closed

adamretter added 4 commits February 20, 2020 13:16

Add Arm64 builds to Travis

2d4161a

Don't run builds on Travis arm64 for targets are impossible

421f56f

Build CMake from source on Arm64 platforms

64df4dd

Need to manually install OpenJDK for java_test on Arm64 Travis CI

31d9988

adamretter force-pushed the feature/travis-arm64 branch from 35bfc1c to 31d9988 Compare February 20, 2020 12:18

Use CMake binaries on Arm64 as suggested by @guyuqi facebook#6436

7d2a87e

pdillinger closed this Mar 13, 2020

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5932

Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5932

adamretter commented Oct 16, 2019 •

edited

Loading

adamretter commented Oct 19, 2019 •

edited

Loading

wangxiyuan commented Oct 21, 2019

Yikun commented Oct 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

guyuqi commented Oct 21, 2019

wangxiyuan commented Oct 29, 2019

adamretter commented Oct 29, 2019

pdillinger commented Dec 5, 2019 •

edited by adamretter

Loading

wangxiyuan commented Dec 10, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 10, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 10, 2019 •

edited

Loading

wangxiyuan commented Dec 11, 2019

wangxiyuan commented Dec 11, 2019

pdillinger commented Dec 11, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 11, 2019

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 •

edited

Loading

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 •

edited

Loading

pdillinger commented Mar 13, 2020

Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5932

Add Arm64 builds to Travis #5932

Conversation

adamretter commented Oct 16, 2019 • edited Loading

adamretter commented Oct 19, 2019 • edited Loading

wangxiyuan commented Oct 21, 2019

Yikun commented Oct 21, 2019 • edited Loading

guyuqi commented Oct 21, 2019

wangxiyuan commented Oct 29, 2019

adamretter commented Oct 29, 2019

pdillinger commented Dec 5, 2019 • edited by adamretter Loading

wangxiyuan commented Dec 10, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 10, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 10, 2019 • edited Loading

wangxiyuan commented Dec 11, 2019

wangxiyuan commented Dec 11, 2019

pdillinger commented Dec 11, 2019

adamretter commented Dec 11, 2019

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 • edited Loading

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 • edited Loading

pdillinger commented Mar 13, 2020

adamretter commented Oct 16, 2019 •

edited

Loading

adamretter commented Oct 19, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Yikun commented Oct 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

pdillinger commented Dec 5, 2019 •

edited by adamretter

Loading

adamretter commented Dec 10, 2019 •

edited

Loading

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 •

edited

Loading

JunHe77 commented Feb 13, 2020 •

edited

Loading