Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comments to dox strings #1

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

etpalmer63
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Additional background

Checklist

The proposed changes:

  • fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
  • add new capabilities to AMReX
  • changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
  • are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users
  • include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate

WeiqunZhang and others added 3 commits November 11, 2021 16:53
For the multi-level EB nodal solver with a singular matrix, we restrict the
fine level RHS to the coarse level, and fix the coarse level's solvability
by making the total sum of RHS is zero.  The restriction is done with the
stencil instead of simply geometric restriction because we need to take the
EB into account.  However, the previous way is incorrect if the sigma
coefficient is not a constant, because the stencil includes sigma.  But the
restriction should be based on EB information only.  In this commit, we fix
this by constructing a special constant sigma stencil.  We use this new
stencil for the restriction of RHS, and for consistence the residual as
well.  Because we used to use the original stencil for the restriction of
residual, this commit will change the answer at the tolerance level for
multi-level problems.
asalmgren pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
It can turn "N5amrex3BoxE" into "amrex::Box", and "Z4mainEUlvE_" into
"main::{lambda()#1}".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants