-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EIP-1559 Implementers' Call #3 #184
Comments
I won't be able to make it but my vote is strongly against bundling the EIPs since 1559 makes sense and adds value on its own, and escalator makes sense and adds value on its own so there is no need to bundle them. I would fully support having an escalator EIP that It may be premature (seeing as how 2718 is still in DRAFT), but if EIP 2718: Typed Transaction Envelope makes it to final before 1559, then I think we should switch over to using it. |
@barnabemonnot's notes for today's call: https://github.com/ethereum/rig/blob/master/eip1559/notes-call3.md |
Relevant analysis on the Escalator algorithm published today: https://insights.deribit.com/market-research/analysis-of-eip-2593-escalator/ |
Transcript for the call: https://notes.ethereum.org/@afhGjrKfTKmksTOtqhB9RQ/SkN2TbfC8 |
EIP-1559 Implementers' Call 3
The purpose of this call is for various teams/individuals working on aspects of EIP-1559 to discuss the implementation plan and next steps to move the EIP forward.
Agenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: