Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-7830: Move to Review #9265

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

Update EIP-7830: Move to Review #9265

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

axic
Copy link
Member

@axic axic commented Jan 25, 2025

No description provided.

@axic axic requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner January 25, 2025 15:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-status Changes a proposal's status s-review This EIP is in Review t-core labels Jan 25, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Jan 25, 2025

✅ All reviewers have approved.

@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-review Waiting on editor to review label Jan 25, 2025
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Mark EIP-7830 review Update EIP-7830: Move to Review Jan 25, 2025
@axic axic marked this pull request as draft January 25, 2025 15:22
@@ -60,16 +58,12 @@ A simple analysis shows contract deployements for 64 KiB contracts to be between

Note that the Max 30M gas contract size of 135 KiB is outside the limits of what is proposed in this EIP and is included to show what it would take to exceed current gas limits.

<!-- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C2dd5sVnZNKXOpRknHhxt6MnTTN50c3b9d6ZU2rvqDQ/edit?usp=sharing -->
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shemnon this is not accessible. If you want to make it public, can you post it on the magicians thread?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made viewable, but being in a comment it will be deleted when going to final/last call.

Copy link
Member Author

@axic axic Jan 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It actually needs to deleted now going into review. Hence why I asked to post it on the magicians thread if it is still relevant.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's posted to the thread, you can delete.

@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ Storage cost is already paid per contract byte.

[EIP-170](./eip-170.md) specifies `MAX_CODE_SIZE` as 24576 bytes, and [EIP-3860](./eip-3860.md) specifies `MAX_INITCODE_SIZE` as `2 * MAX_CODE_SIZE` (49152 bytes).

<!-- TODO: if profiling analysis shows we need to charge more for EOF analysis, this is where we can specify it. Either globally or for 0xef00 contracs -->
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shemnon @chfast @gumb0 do we expect more cost for EOF analysis? I doubt.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We haven't measured this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reminder: validation is only performed when a contract is brought in via a transaction. A factory create from an existing contract has no validation burden.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tracked in ipsilon/eof#175

@axic axic marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2025 23:06
@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) January 27, 2025 15:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@eth-bot eth-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...

@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit ecb61ef into ethereum:master Jan 27, 2025
24 checks passed
@axic axic deleted the 7830-review branch January 27, 2025 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-status Changes a proposal's status e-review Waiting on editor to review s-review This EIP is in Review t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants