Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renaming Purity Checker -> Safety Checker #126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2020

Conversation

ben-chain
Copy link
Collaborator

@ben-chain ben-chain commented May 1, 2020

Description

Renames our Purity Checker to Safety Checker as it does not technically enforce that contracts are pure funcitons.

Questions

Metadata

Fixes

  • Fixes # [Link to Issue]

Contributing Agreement

Copy link

@willmeister willmeister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@K-Ho K-Ho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 🕺🏻

Copy link
Contributor

@karlfloersch karlfloersch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's get that money! 💰

@ben-chain ben-chain merged commit e863d2f into master May 4, 2020
@gakonst gakonst deleted the feat/naming/safety-checker branch March 18, 2021 15:01
snario pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2021
protolambda added a commit to protolambda/optimism that referenced this pull request May 1, 2022
…l1-downloader

ref impl: L1 downloader of blocks and receipts
OptimismBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
* feat: create shared lockbox contract with its interface and unit tests

* chore: polish tests and interfaces

* chore: run pre-pr

* chore: improve natspec

* chore: run pre-pr

* chore: update compiler version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants