Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contract-bedrock: recorrect the smart contract files structure #11191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

rickck11
Copy link
Contributor

Modified the correct file path.

@rickck11 rickck11 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 21, 2024 13:54
@rickck11 rickck11 requested a review from refcell July 21, 2024 13:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.13%. Comparing base (8b910d7) to head (df29e8d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #11191   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    64.13%   64.13%           
========================================
  Files           30       30           
  Lines         2169     2169           
  Branches        73       73           
========================================
  Hits          1391     1391           
  Misses         731      731           
  Partials        47       47           
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests 79.70% <ø> (ø)
chain-mon-tests 27.14% <ø> (ø)
sdk-tests 16.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 22, 2024
@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into ethereum-optimism:develop with commit 834eec7 Jul 22, 2024
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants