-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: typo in the code comments #10229
fix: typo in the code comments #10229
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update involves refining comments within the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
@threewebcode the skip CI part seemed to cause an issue. We never skip CI in this repo |
Got it and follow this rule from now on. |
@threewebcode specifically to merge this PR, you need to modify the commit to remove |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Done |
Currently, I use OP as l2 solution for customization project. |
As private deployment, i adopt my own bridge to replace standard bridge. Moreover, I also modify op-geth for allocation. There are more upcoming changes like ZK fraud proof and cross-chain integration. |
7e93729
Description
There is typo in the code comment and use this change to correct it.