Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attack mode only during attack event #158

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023
Merged

Attack mode only during attack event #158

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

gitesthuman
Copy link
Contributor

@gitesthuman gitesthuman commented Mar 16, 2023

Pull request review checklist 📝 ✅

This is a checklist that helps conduct a pull request review properly. These points are required to merge the PR

  • There are no merge conflicts

  • The pull request is named accordingly (description of the functionality - it
    will be visible in the changelog later)

  • Every task requirement (from Jira) is done

  • The app runs, it boots up properly (e.g. no syntax errors)

  • The proposed functionality is working properly (you need to pull this branch
    and check for yourself)

  • Each function, class or functionality is properly documented
    (short description of what it does, parameters or return values if they need
    any explanation)

@gitesthuman gitesthuman requested review from Mixss and Cellmer March 16, 2023 13:21
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Test Results

13 tests  ±0   13 ✔️ ±0   1s ⏱️ -1s
  1 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ±0 

Results for commit e92d972. ± Comparison against base commit db3cea8.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@Mixss Mixss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image
tego bliższego mogę zaatakować, tego dalszego nie; nie mogą tak samo wyglądać

@Mixss
Copy link
Contributor

Mixss commented Mar 16, 2023

i tak samo np to pole pod czwórką też nie jest atakowalne

@Mixss
Copy link
Contributor

Mixss commented Mar 16, 2023

chyba że nie takie było założenie tego okręgu, tak czy siak moja pierwsza sugestia musi być naprawiona

@Mixss
Copy link
Contributor

Mixss commented Mar 16, 2023

image
"pierwsza" sugestia polegała na tym, że nie widać różnicy między tym czy potwora można zaatakować czy nie. Dalej jest to samo

@gitesthuman
Copy link
Contributor Author

image "pierwsza" sugestia polegała na tym, że nie widać różnicy między tym czy potwora można zaatakować czy nie. Dalej jest to samo

farmazonie łysy, nie spullowałeś

@gitesthuman gitesthuman merged commit beb393d into staging Mar 16, 2023
@gitesthuman gitesthuman deleted the attack-rework branch March 16, 2023 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants