Name and sort population_age vector
#81
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses comments raised by the package review PR #73. It names the
population_agevector with"lower"and"upper"and sorts the vector in case the user provides the age vector asc(upper_bound, lower_bound).Throughout the code elements of
population_ageare now extracted as[["lower"]]and[["upper"]]instead of[1]and[2].This development also found a bug in
sim_contacts()when age structured populations are supplied topopulation_age. The<data.frame>supplied by the user was not being transformed (by.check_age_df()) before being passed to.sim_internal()(which was happening insim_linelist()andsim_outbreak()). This has been fixed and a test added to check this use case.