-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport dfuse support #38
Conversation
@swatanabe I would like to probably update the On the reading part, based on the version information, I'm instantiating the correct decoder. Now, probably that the fork or some identifier will be required also so I would have access to more information on the decoding part to take a decision. Now it's look like this:
And proposition:
|
I suspect that the transaction trace and block are using the 2.0 format. The transaction and block format was changed in 2.1 to support pruning context free data and we have not and do not intend to backport this. |
You still have return value right? I knew that pruning was not being ported over. Hence why I decided to raise the "variant" in the |
…ount for the fact that the [trans]action_trace::elapsed field is non-deterministic.
No description provided.