Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Python Enums as values for Enum trait #685
Support Python Enums as values for Enum trait #685
Changes from all commits
a2f192a
756df8b
53245e8
61672a4
cc2bedd
b44ce97
3cd1ee8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was trying to tackle #389 and this line is all I needed to solve #389.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kitchoi can you clarify: if this PR gets merged, does that mean #389 can be closed? Or is there more work to do between merging this PR and solving #389?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think #389 can be closed by this PR (as of now) without more being done to it.
While #389 concerns the dictionary only, the idea is to relax the requirement on the
values
supporting__index__
. As long asvalues
implements__iter__
, Enum can obtain the allowed values.I understand your concern with the potential non-deterministic behaviour, e.g. for
set
and thedict
prior to Python 3.6. But if, say,values
is an instance ofOrderedDict
, theEnum
on master will fail trying to use the first key as a default. One has to make another property traits to return a list from the keys ofOrderedDict
. I guess it is about how opinionated thisEnum
should be when it comes to setting a default value.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To verify:
On this branch, a value
'a'
was printed.On master, this results in an error:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm. I think I liked the error better. :-)