Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

enthought / traits Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 85
Star 444

Code
Issues 227
Pull requests 2
Actions
Wiki
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Wiki
Security
Insights

Document the '-' pattern for on_trait_change.#1592

Merged

mdickinson merged 5 commits intomainenthought/traits:mainfrom doc/document-any-trait-with-minusenthought/traits:doc/document-any-trait-with-minusCopy head branch name to clipboard

Nov 8, 2021

+14-1

Conversation Commits5 (5)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Nov 5, 2021

Document the '-' pattern for on_trait_change.
mdickinson
committed
Fix on_trait_change call syntax
mdickinson
committed
... and make it clearer that it's a method call
mdickinson
committed
Fix reST table formatting
mdickinson
committed
Don't claim that one pattern will be more performant
mdickinson
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.