-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump glimmer-vm packages to 0.24. #15245
Conversation
This will break a lot of things but is a good excuse to rethink the "process args" code.
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #15247) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #15254) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This is only needed when a catastrophic failure happens that prevents the normal removal from working. Doing this in the teardown greatly reduces the number of invalid faulures when errors occur during rendering.
These are largely duplication functionality in `{{each-in}}`'s own tests. They were added as a way to flesh out the iterable implementation.
Interesting seeing the dog fooding of component-managers and how they are used. Good stuff and much to learn. |
…PathReference` API.
Fixes a few node tests.
Did some quick asset size checks, and the |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
didCreateElement() {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't these go on the abstract manager?
return null; | ||
} | ||
|
||
didCreateElement() {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment about putting them on the abstract manager.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, totally agreed.
LGTM |
Woop |
ember-glimmer/utils/iterable
#14763 (comment))