-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add simple global controls to put the call in picture-in-picture mode #2573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
By default, observables running with shareReplay will continue running forever even if there are no subscribers. We need to stop them when the view model is destroyed to avoid memory leaks and other unintuitive behavior.
This ensures that only a single view model is created per call, unlike the previous solution which would create extra view models in strict mode which it was unable to dispose of. The other way was invalid because React gives us no way to reliably dispose of a resource created in the render phase. This is essentially a memory leak fix.
Our web and mobile apps (will) all support putting calls into a picture-in-picture mode. However, it'd be nice to have a way of doing this that's more explicit than a breakpoint, because PiP views could in theory get fairly large. Specifically, on mobile, we want a way to do this that can tell you whether the call is ongoing, and that works even without the widget API (because we support SPA calls in the Element X apps…) To this end, I've created a simple global "controls" API on the window. Right now it only has methods for controlling the picture-in-picture state, but in theory we can expand it to also control mute states, which is current possible via the widget API only.
bmarty
reviewed
Aug 22, 2024
toger5
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me.
I think we should meet up and discuss if we want to commit to one of the two:
- custom js methods
- custom widget api actions that get caught by the host client before making it to the widget api.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our web and mobile apps (will) all support putting calls into a picture-in-picture mode. However, it'd be nice to have a way of doing this that's more explicit than a breakpoint, because PiP views could in theory get fairly large. Specifically, on mobile, we want a way to do this that can tell you whether the call is ongoing, and that works even without the widget API (because we support SPA calls in the Element X apps…)
To this end, I've created a simple global "controls" API on the window. Right now it only has methods for controlling the picture-in-picture state, but in theory we can expand it to also control mute states, which is current possible via the widget API only.
See the commits for details; I had to make a couple changes along the way to fix some leaks that were causing the APIs to not throw when outside a call.
For #2537