Remove JndiLookup.class from the SQL command line tool #81879
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Pinging @elastic/es-delivery (Team:Delivery) |
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
to ChrisHegarty/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
to ChrisHegarty/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
to ChrisHegarty/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
💔 Backport failed
You can use sqren/backport to manually backport by running |
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
ChrisHegarty
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove the JndiLookup.class from the SQL CLI jar. The mere presence of the JndiLookup.class is not problematic, but it looks interesting and could lead to confusion for scanners. We don't need it.
The change has been verified manually.
Closes #81776