[DOCS] Updates anomaly detection terminology in Stack Overview

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/aggregations.asciidoc

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 By default, {dfeeds} fetch data from {es} using search and scroll requests.
 It can be significantly more efficient, however, to aggregate data in {es}
-and to configure your jobs to analyze aggregated data.
+and to configure your {anomaly-jobs} to analyze aggregated data.
 
 One of the benefits of aggregating data this way is that {es} automatically
 distributes these calculations across your cluster. You can then feed this
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ of the last record in the bucket. If you use a terms aggregation and the
 cardinality of a term is high, then the aggregation might not be effective and
 you might want to just use the default search and scroll behavior.
 
-When you create or update a job, you can include the names of aggregations, for
-example:
+When you create or update an {anomaly-job}, you can include the names of
+aggregations, for example:
 
 [source,js]
 ----------------------------------

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/categories.asciidoc

@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ we do not want the detailed SQL to be considered in the message categorization.
 This particular categorization filter removes the SQL statement from the categorization
 algorithm.
 
-If your data is stored in {es}, you can create an advanced job with these same
-properties:
+If your data is stored in {es}, you can create an advanced {anomaly-job} with
+these same properties:
 
 [role="screenshot"]
 image::images/ml-category-advanced.jpg["Advanced job configuration options related to categorization"]
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ letters in tokens whereas the `ml_classic` tokenizer does, although that could
 be fixed by using more complex regular expressions.
 
 For more information about the `categorization_analyzer` property, see
-{ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-categorizationanalyzer[Categorization Analyzer].
+{ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-categorizationanalyzer[Categorization analyzer].
 
 NOTE: To add the `categorization_analyzer` property in {kib}, you must use the
 **Edit JSON** tab and copy the `categorization_analyzer` object from one of the

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/configuring.asciidoc

@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ your cluster and all master-eligible nodes must have {ml} enabled. By default,
 all nodes are {ml} nodes. For more information about these settings, see 
 {ref}/modules-node.html#ml-node[{ml} nodes].
 
-To use the {ml-features} to analyze your data, you must create a job and
-send your data to that job.
+To use the {ml-features} to analyze your data, you can create an {anomaly-job}
+and send your data to that job.
 
 * If your data is stored in {es}:
 

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/customurl.asciidoc

@@ -2,17 +2,17 @@
 [[ml-configuring-url]]
 === Adding custom URLs to machine learning results
 
-When you create an advanced job or edit any job in {kib}, you can optionally
-attach one or more custom URLs. 
+When you create an advanced {anomaly-job} or edit any {anomaly-jobs} in {kib},
+you can optionally attach one or more custom URLs. 
 
 The custom URLs provide links from the anomalies table in the *Anomaly Explorer*
 or *Single Metric Viewer* window in {kib} to {kib} dashboards, the *Discovery* 
 page, or external websites. For example, you can define a custom URL that 
 provides a way for users to drill down to the source data from the results set.
 
-When you edit a job in {kib}, it simplifies the creation of the custom URLs for  
-{kib} dashboards and the *Discover* page and it enables you to test your URLs. 
-For example:
+When you edit an {anomaly-job} in {kib}, it simplifies the creation of the
+custom URLs for {kib} dashboards and the *Discover* page and it enables you to
+test your URLs. For example:
 
 [role="screenshot"]
 image::images/ml-customurl-edit.jpg["Edit a job to add a custom URL"]
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ As in this case, the custom URL can contain
 are populated when you click the link in the anomalies table. In this example, 
 the custom URL contains `$earliest$`, `$latest$`, and `$service$` tokens, which 
 pass the beginning and end of the time span of the selected anomaly and the 
-pertinent `service` field value to the target page. If you were interested in the following anomaly, for example: 
+pertinent `service` field value to the target page. If you were interested in
+the following anomaly, for example: 
 
 [role="screenshot"]
 image::images/ml-customurl.jpg["An example of the custom URL links in the Anomaly Explorer anomalies table"]
@@ -43,8 +44,8 @@ image::images/ml-customurl-discover.jpg["An example of the results on the Discov
 Since we specified a time range of 2 hours, the time filter restricts the 
 results to the time period two hours before and after the anomaly.
 
-You can also specify these custom URL settings when you create or update jobs by 
-using the {ml} APIs.
+You can also specify these custom URL settings when you create or update
+{anomaly-jobs} by using the APIs.
 
 [float]
 [[ml-configuring-url-strings]]
@@ -74,9 +75,9 @@ time as the earliest and latest times. The same is also true if the interval is
 set to `Auto` and a one hour interval was chosen. You can override this behavior 
 by using the `time_range` setting. 
 
-The `$mlcategoryregex$` and `$mlcategoryterms$` tokens pertain to jobs where you
-are categorizing field values. For more information about this type of analysis,
-see <<ml-configuring-categories>>.
+The `$mlcategoryregex$` and `$mlcategoryterms$` tokens pertain to {anomaly-jobs}
+where you are categorizing field values. For more information about this type of
+analysis, see <<ml-configuring-categories>>.
 
 The `$mlcategoryregex$` token passes the regular expression value of the
 category of the selected anomaly, as identified by the value of the `mlcategory`

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/delayed-data-detection.asciidoc

@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ functions are not really affected. In these situations, it all comes out okay in
 the end as the delayed data is distributed randomly. An example would be a `mean`
 metric for a field in a large collection of data. In this case, checking for
 delayed data may not provide much benefit. If data are consistently delayed,
-however, jobs with a `low_count` function may provide false positives. In this
-situation, it would be useful to see if data comes in after an anomaly is
+however, {anomaly-jobs} with a `low_count` function may provide false positives.
+In this situation, it would be useful to see if data comes in after an anomaly is
 recorded so that you can determine a next course of action.
 
 ==== How do we detect delayed data?
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ Every 15 minutes or every `check_window`, whichever is smaller, the datafeed
 triggers a document search over the configured indices. This search looks over a
 time span with a length of `check_window` ending with the latest finalized bucket.
 That time span is partitioned into buckets, whose length equals the bucket span
-of the associated job. The `doc_count` of those buckets are then compared with
-the job's finalized analysis buckets to see whether any data has arrived since
-the analysis. If there is indeed missing data due to their ingest delay, the end
-user is notified. For example, you can see annotations in {kib} for the periods
-where these delays occur.
+of the associated {anomaly-job}. The `doc_count` of those buckets are then
+compared with the job's finalized analysis buckets to see whether any data has
+arrived since the analysis. If there is indeed missing data due to their ingest
+delay, the end user is notified. For example, you can see annotations in {kib}
+for the periods where these delays occur.
 
 ==== What to do about delayed data?
 

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/detector-custom-rules.asciidoc

@@ -16,17 +16,18 @@ Let us see how those can be configured by examples.
 
 ==== Specifying custom rule scope
 
-Let us assume we are configuring a job in order to detect DNS data exfiltration.
-Our data contain fields "subdomain" and "highest_registered_domain".
-We can use a detector that looks like `high_info_content(subdomain) over highest_registered_domain`.
-If we run such a job it is possible that we discover a lot of anomalies on 
-frequently used domains that we have reasons to trust. As security analysts, we 
-are not interested in such anomalies. Ideally, we could instruct the detector to 
-skip results for domains that we consider safe. Using a rule with a scope allows 
-us to achieve this.
+Let us assume we are configuring an {anomaly-job} in order to detect DNS data
+exfiltration. Our data contain fields "subdomain" and "highest_registered_domain".
+We can use a detector that looks like
+`high_info_content(subdomain) over highest_registered_domain`. If we run such a
+job, it is possible that we discover a lot of anomalies on frequently used
+domains that we have reasons to trust. As security analysts, we are not
+interested in such anomalies. Ideally, we could instruct the detector to skip
+results for domains that we consider safe. Using a rule with a scope allows us
+to achieve this.
 
 First, we need to create a list of our safe domains. Those lists are called 
-_filters_ in {ml}. Filters can be shared across jobs.
+_filters_ in {ml}. Filters can be shared across {anomaly-jobs}.
 
 We create our filter using the {ref}/ml-put-filter.html[put filter API]:
 
@@ -41,8 +42,8 @@ PUT _ml/filters/safe_domains
 // CONSOLE
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
-Now, we can create our job specifying a scope that uses the `safe_domains` 
-filter for the `highest_registered_domain` field:
+Now, we can create our {anomaly-job} specifying a scope that uses the
+`safe_domains`  filter for the `highest_registered_domain` field:
 
 [source,js]
 ----------------------------------
@@ -139,8 +140,8 @@ example, 0.02. Given our knowledge about how CPU utilization behaves we might
 determine that anomalies with such small actual values are not interesting for 
 investigation.
 
-Let us now configure a job with a rule that will skip results where CPU 
-utilization is less than 0.20.
+Let us now configure an {anomaly-job} with a rule that will skip results where
+CPU utilization is less than 0.20.
 
 [source,js]
 ----------------------------------
@@ -214,18 +215,18 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/rule_with_range
 ==== Custom rules in the life-cycle of a job
 
 Custom rules only affect results created after the rules were applied.
-Let us imagine that we have configured a job and it has been running
+Let us imagine that we have configured an {anomaly-job} and it has been running
 for some time. After observing its results we decide that we can employ
 rules in order to get rid of some uninteresting results. We can use
-the {ref}/ml-update-job.html[update job API] to do so. However, the rule we 
-added will only be in effect for any results created from the moment we added 
-the rule onwards. Past results will remain unaffected.
+the {ref}/ml-update-job.html[update {anomaly-job} API] to do so. However, the
+rule we added will only be in effect for any results created from the moment we
+added  the rule onwards. Past results will remain unaffected.
 
-==== Using custom rules VS filtering data
+==== Using custom rules vs. filtering data
 
 It might appear like using rules is just another way of filtering the data
-that feeds into a job. For example, a rule that skips results when the
-partition field value is in a filter sounds equivalent to having a query
+that feeds into an {anomaly-job}. For example, a rule that skips results when
+the partition field value is in a filter sounds equivalent to having a query
 that filters out such documents. But it is not. There is a fundamental
 difference. When the data is filtered before reaching a job it is as if they
 never existed for the job. With rules, the data still reaches the job and

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/functions.asciidoc

@@ -5,10 +5,10 @@
 The {ml-features} include analysis functions that provide a wide variety of
 flexible ways to analyze data for anomalies.
 
-When you create jobs, you specify one or more detectors, which define the type of
-analysis that needs to be done. If you are creating your job by using {ml} APIs,
-you specify the functions in
-{ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector Configuration Objects].
+When you create {anomaly-jobs}, you specify one or more detectors, which define
+the type of analysis that needs to be done. If you are creating your job by
+using {ml} APIs, you specify the functions in
+{ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector configuration objects].
 If you are creating your job in {kib}, you specify the functions differently
 depending on whether you are creating single metric, multi-metric, or advanced
 jobs.
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ You can specify a `summary_count_field_name` with any function except `metric`.
 When you use `summary_count_field_name`, the {ml} features expect the input
 data to be pre-aggregated. The value of the `summary_count_field_name` field
 must contain the count of raw events that were summarized. In {kib}, use the
-**summary_count_field_name** in advanced jobs. Analyzing aggregated input data
-provides a significant boost in performance. For more information, see
+**summary_count_field_name** in advanced {anomaly-jobs}. Analyzing aggregated
+input data provides a significant boost in performance. For more information, see
 <<ml-configuring-aggregation>>.
 
 If your data is sparse, there may be gaps in the data which means you might have

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/functions/count.asciidoc

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ These functions support the following properties:
 * `partition_field_name` (optional)
 
 For more information about those properties,
-see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector Configuration Objects].
+see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector configuration objects].
 
 .Example 1: Analyzing events with the count function
 [source,js]
@@ -65,8 +65,9 @@ This example is probably the simplest possible analysis. It identifies
 time buckets during which the overall count of events is higher or lower than
 usual.
 
-When you use this function in a detector in your job, it models the event rate
-and detects when the event rate is unusual compared to its past behavior.
+When you use this function in a detector in your {anomaly-job}, it models the
+event rate and detects when the event rate is unusual compared to its past
+behavior.
 
 .Example 2: Analyzing errors with the high_count function
 [source,js]
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example2
 // CONSOLE
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
-If you use this `high_count` function in a detector in your job, it
+If you use this `high_count` function in a detector in your {anomaly-job}, it
 models the event rate for each error code. It detects users that generate an
 unusually high count of error codes compared to other users.
 
@@ -117,9 +118,9 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example3
 In this example, the function detects when the count of events for a
 status code is lower than usual.
 
-When you use this function in a detector in your job, it models the event rate
-for each status code and detects when a status code has an unusually low count
-compared to its past behavior.
+When you use this function in a detector in your {anomaly-job}, it models the
+event rate for each status code and detects when a status code has an unusually
+low count compared to its past behavior.
 
 .Example 4: Analyzing aggregated data with the count function
 [source,js]
@@ -168,7 +169,7 @@ These functions support the following properties:
 * `partition_field_name` (optional)
 
 For more information about those properties,
-see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector Configuration Objects].
+see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector configuration objects].
 
 For example, if you have the following number of events per bucket:
 
@@ -206,10 +207,10 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example5
 // CONSOLE
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
-If you use this `high_non_zero_count` function in a detector in your job, it
-models the count of events for the `signaturename` field. It ignores any buckets
-where the count is zero and detects when a `signaturename` value has an
-unusually high count of events compared to its past behavior.
+If you use this `high_non_zero_count` function in a detector in your
+{anomaly-job}, it models the count of events for the `signaturename` field. It
+ignores any buckets where the count is zero and detects when a `signaturename`
+value has an unusually high count of events compared to its past behavior.
 
 NOTE: Population analysis (using an `over_field_name` property value) is not
 supported for the `non_zero_count`, `high_non_zero_count`, and
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ These functions support the following properties:
 * `partition_field_name` (optional)
 
 For more information about those properties,
-see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector Configuration Objects].
+see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector configuration objects].
 
 .Example 6: Analyzing users with the distinct_count function
 [source,js]
@@ -261,9 +262,9 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example6
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
 This `distinct_count` function detects when a system has an unusual number
-of logged in users. When you use this function in a detector in your job, it
-models the distinct count of users. It also detects when the distinct number of
-users is unusual compared to the past.
+of logged in users. When you use this function in a detector in your
+{anomaly-job}, it models the distinct count of users. It also detects when the
+distinct number of users is unusual compared to the past.
 
 .Example 7: Analyzing ports with the high_distinct_count function
 [source,js]
@@ -287,6 +288,6 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example7
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
 This example detects instances of port scanning. When you use this function in a
-detector in your job, it models the distinct count of ports. It also detects the
-`src_ip` values that connect to an unusually high number of different
+detector in your {anomaly-job}, it models the distinct count of ports. It also
+detects the `src_ip` values that connect to an unusually high number of different
 `dst_ports` values compared to other `src_ip` values.

docs/reference/ml/anomaly-detection/functions/geo.asciidoc

@@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ input data.
 
 The {ml-features} include the following geographic function: `lat_long`.
 
-NOTE: You cannot create forecasts for jobs that contain geographic functions. 
-You also cannot add rules with conditions to detectors that use geographic 
-functions. 
+NOTE: You cannot create forecasts for {anomaly-jobs} that contain geographic
+functions. You also cannot add rules with conditions to detectors that use
+geographic functions. 
 
 [float]
 [[ml-lat-long]]
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ This function supports the following properties:
 * `partition_field_name` (optional)
 
 For more information about those properties,
-see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector Configuration Objects].
+see {ref}/ml-job-resource.html#ml-detectorconfig[Detector configuration objects].
 
 .Example 1: Analyzing transactions with the lat_long function
 [source,js]
@@ -49,15 +49,15 @@ PUT _ml/anomaly_detectors/example1
 // CONSOLE
 // TEST[skip:needs-licence]
 
-If you use this `lat_long` function in a detector in your job, it
+If you use this `lat_long` function in a detector in your {anomaly-job}, it
 detects anomalies where the geographic location of a credit card transaction is
 unusual for a particular customer’s credit card. An anomaly might indicate fraud.
 
 IMPORTANT: The `field_name` that you supply must be a single string that contains
 two comma-separated numbers of the form `latitude,longitude`, a `geo_point` field,
 a `geo_shape` field that contains point values, or a `geo_centroid` aggregation.
-The `latitude` and `longitude` must be in the range -180 to 180 and represent a point on the
-surface of the Earth.
+The `latitude` and `longitude` must be in the range -180 to 180 and represent a
+point on the surface of the Earth.
 
 For example, JSON data might contain the following transaction coordinates:
 
@@ -75,6 +75,6 @@ In {es}, location data is likely to be stored in `geo_point` fields. For more
 information, see {ref}/geo-point.html[Geo-point datatype]. This data type is
 supported natively in {ml-features}. Specifically, {dfeed} when pulling data from
 a `geo_point` field, will transform the data into the appropriate `lat,lon` string
-format before sending to the {ml} job.
+format before sending to the {anomaly-job}.
 
 For more information, see <<ml-configuring-transform>>.